BUFC vs ETJ
AB Conservative Buffer ETF vs Eaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund
Which is better, BUFC or ETJ?
Each has led over a different period.
BUFC has a lower expense ratio. BUFC led over 1Y, ETJ over the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BUFC | ETJ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.69%Best | 1.11% |
| AUM | $1.1B | $614M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 8.55% |
| Holdings | 7 | 74 |
| YTD Return | +5.05%Best | -1.86% |
| 1Y Return | +7.23%Best | -1.01% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +10.94% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +2.70% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3.4%Best | 9.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -8.3%Best | -18.3% |
| $10,000 over 2.8 years | $12,321 | $12,996Best |
| Fund Family | AllianceBernstein L.P. | Eaton Vance |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Dec 13, 2023 | Jul 31, 2007 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 13, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.8 years).
BUFC vs ETJ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.8 years both funds cover.
BUFC vs ETJ Performance
AB Conservative Buffer ETF (BUFC) is an ETF from AllianceBernstein L.P. and Eaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund (ETJ) is an ETF from Eaton Vance. Over the past year BUFC returned +7.23% while ETJ returned -1.01%. Year to date, BUFC is up 5.05% versus a loss of 1.86% for ETJ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ETJ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 9.2% compared with 3.4% for BUFC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.3% for BUFC and -18.3% for ETJ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BUFC charges 0.69% per year while ETJ charges 1.11%. On a $10,000 position that is $69 vs $111 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BUFC currently yields 0.00% against 8.55% for ETJ.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BUFC and ETJ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BUFC or ETJ?
BUFC has an expense ratio of 0.69% while ETJ charges 1.11%. BUFC is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BUFC or ETJ?
Over the past year BUFC returned +7.23% vs -1.01% for ETJ, so BUFC leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BUFC or ETJ?
ETJ has been the more volatile fund at 9.2% annualized versus 3.4% for BUFC. Worst drawdown: BUFC -8.3% vs ETJ -18.3%.
Should I hold both BUFC and ETJ?
BUFC and ETJ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BUFC or ETJ?
BUFC yields 0.00% while ETJ yields 8.55%, so ETJ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ETJ better than BUFC?
BUFC has a lower expense ratio. BUFC led over 1Y, ETJ over the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.