BUFC vs NVDD

BUFC vs NVDD

Which is better, BUFC or NVDD?

Opposite sides of the same exposure.

BUFC has a lower expense ratio. BUFC led over 1Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.55, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees.

Lower Fees: BUFCHigher Returns: BUFC

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBUFCNVDD
Expense Ratio0.69%Best1.01%
AUM$1.1B$16M
Dividend Yield0.00%4.73%
Holdings79
YTD Return+5.05%Best-19.27%
1Y Return+7.23%Best-23.66%
3Y Return (annualized)--48.47%
Volatility (annualized)3.4%Best32.3%
Max Drawdown-8.3%Best-86.8%
$10,000 over 2.8 years$12,321Best$1,476
Fund FamilyAllianceBernstein L.P.Direxion Shares ETF Trust
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleMulti AlternativeMulti Alternative
InceptionDec 13, 2023Sep 13, 2023

Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 13, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.8 years).

BUFC vs NVDD growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.8 years both funds cover.

Compare BUFC against instead:BUFC vs SPYBUFC vs QQQBUFC vs VOOBUFC vs VTINVDD against:NVDD vs VXUS

BUFC vs NVDD Performance

AB Conservative Buffer ETF (BUFC) is an ETF from AllianceBernstein L.P. and Direxion Daily NVDA Bear 1X ETF (NVDD) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust. Over the past year BUFC returned +7.23% while NVDD returned -23.66%. Year to date, BUFC is up 5.05% versus a loss of 19.27% for NVDD.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

NVDD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 32.3% compared with 3.4% for BUFC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.3% for BUFC and -86.8% for NVDD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.55. They move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, while paying both funds' fees.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BUFC charges 0.69% per year while NVDD charges 1.01%. On a $10,000 position that is $69 vs $101 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BUFC currently yields 0.00% against 4.73% for NVDD.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of BUFC and NVDD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

BUFCNVDD

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BUFC or NVDD?

BUFC has an expense ratio of 0.69% while NVDD charges 1.01%. BUFC is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, BUFC or NVDD?

Over the past year BUFC returned +7.23% vs -23.66% for NVDD, so BUFC leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, BUFC or NVDD?

NVDD has been the more volatile fund at 32.3% annualized versus 3.4% for BUFC. Worst drawdown: BUFC -8.3% vs NVDD -86.8%.

Should I hold both BUFC and NVDD?

BUFC and NVDD have a monthly-return correlation of -0.55, so they move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, and pays both funds' fees on the way. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, BUFC or NVDD?

BUFC yields 0.00% while NVDD yields 4.73%, so NVDD currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is NVDD better than BUFC?

BUFC has a lower expense ratio. BUFC led over 1Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.55, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.