BUFC vs XSPI
AB Conservative Buffer ETF vs NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF
Which is better, BUFC or XSPI?
BUFC costs less.
BUFC has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BUFC | XSPI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.69%Best | 0.98% |
| AUM | $1.1B | $119M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 9.60% |
| Holdings | 7 | 1,018 |
| YTD Return | +5.05% | +11.70%Best |
| 1Y Return | +7.23% | - |
| Fund Family | AllianceBernstein L.P. | NEOS |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Dec 13, 2023 | Feb 2, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
BUFC vs XSPI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BUFC vs XSPI Performance
AB Conservative Buffer ETF (BUFC) is an ETF from AllianceBernstein L.P. and NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF (XSPI) is an ETF from NEOS. Year to date, BUFC is up 5.05% versus a gain of 11.70% for XSPI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BUFC charges 0.69% per year while XSPI charges 0.98%. On a $10,000 position that is $69 vs $98 annually, a gap of $29 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BUFC currently yields 0.00% against 9.60% for XSPI.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BUFC and XSPI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BUFC or XSPI?
BUFC has an expense ratio of 0.69% while XSPI charges 0.98%. BUFC is the cheaper option, by $29 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, BUFC or XSPI?
BUFC yields 0.00% while XSPI yields 9.60%, so XSPI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XSPI better than BUFC?
BUFC has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.