BUFG vs FMAR

BUFG vs FMAR

Which is better, BUFG or FMAR?

Nearly the same fund. FMAR costs less.

FMAR has a lower expense ratio. FMAR led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96.

Lower Fees: FMARHigher Returns: FMAR

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBUFGFMAR
Expense Ratio1.13%0.85%Best
AUM$338M$1.2B
Dividend Yield0.00%0.00%
Holdings1610
YTD Return+9.10%+13.39%Best
1Y Return+12.26%+16.31%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+14.60%+14.66%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+8.63%+10.74%Best
Volatility (annualized)10.4%9.2%Best
Max Drawdown-17.6%-14.4%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$15,127$16,654Best
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)First Trust Portfolios (US)
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleOption WritingOption Writing
InceptionOct 26, 2021Mar 19, 2021

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 27, 2021 to Oct 14, 2026 (5 years).

BUFG vs FMAR growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5 years both funds cover.

Compare BUFG against instead:BUFG vs SPYBUFG vs QQQBUFG vs VOOBUFG vs VTIFMAR against:FMAR vs VXUS

BUFG vs FMAR Performance

FT Vest Buffered Allocation Growth ETF (BUFG) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF - March (FMAR) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year BUFG returned +12.26% while FMAR returned +16.31%. Year to date, BUFG is up 9.10% versus a gain of 13.39% for FMAR.

Over three years, BUFG compounded at +14.60% per year against +14.66% for FMAR; over five years the annualized figures are +8.63% and +10.74% respectively.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

BUFG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 10.4% compared with 9.2% for FMAR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.6% for BUFG and -14.4% for FMAR. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BUFG charges 1.13% per year while FMAR charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $113 vs $85 annually, a gap of $28 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BUFG currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for FMAR.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of BUFG and FMAR you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

BUFGFMAR

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BUFG or FMAR?

BUFG has an expense ratio of 1.13% while FMAR charges 0.85%. FMAR is the cheaper option, by $28 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, BUFG or FMAR?

Over the past year BUFG returned +12.26% vs +16.31% for FMAR, so FMAR leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, BUFG or FMAR?

BUFG has been the more volatile fund at 10.4% annualized versus 9.2% for FMAR. Worst drawdown: BUFG -17.6% vs FMAR -14.4%.

Should I hold both BUFG and FMAR?

BUFG and FMAR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, BUFG or FMAR?

BUFG yields 0.00% while FMAR yields 0.00%, so FMAR currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is FMAR better than BUFG?

FMAR has a lower expense ratio. FMAR led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.