BUFM vs FAPR
AB Moderate Buffer ETF vs FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF - April
Which is better, BUFM or FAPR?
Each has led over a different period.
BUFM has a lower expense ratio. BUFM led over the full window, FAPR over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BUFM | FAPR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.69%Best | 0.85% |
| AUM | $492M | $1.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 7 | 10 |
| YTD Return | +4.67% | +8.21%Best |
| 1Y Return | +7.70% | +10.78%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.68% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +8.84% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.3% | 4.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -9.4%Best | -11.6% |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $11,674Best | $11,563 |
| Fund Family | AllianceBernstein L.P. | First Trust Portfolios (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Dec 9, 2024 | Apr 16, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 10, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.8 years).
BUFM vs FAPR growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
BUFM vs FAPR Performance
AB Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFM) is an ETF from AllianceBernstein L.P. and FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF - April (FAPR) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year BUFM returned +7.70% while FAPR returned +10.78%. Year to date, BUFM is up 4.67% versus a gain of 8.21% for FAPR.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BUFM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 5.3% compared with 4.7% for FAPR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.4% for BUFM and -11.6% for FAPR. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BUFM charges 0.69% per year while FAPR charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $69 vs $85 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BUFM currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for FAPR.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BUFM and FAPR you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BUFM or FAPR?
BUFM has an expense ratio of 0.69% while FAPR charges 0.85%. BUFM is the cheaper option, by $16 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BUFM or FAPR?
Over the past year BUFM returned +7.70% vs +10.78% for FAPR, so FAPR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BUFM annualized +8.98% vs +8.40% for FAPR. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BUFM or FAPR?
BUFM has been the more volatile fund at 5.3% annualized versus 4.7% for FAPR. Worst drawdown: BUFM -9.4% vs FAPR -11.6%.
Should I hold both BUFM and FAPR?
BUFM and FAPR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BUFM or FAPR?
BUFM yields 0.00% while FAPR yields 0.00%, so FAPR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FAPR better than BUFM?
BUFM has a lower expense ratio. BUFM led over the full window, FAPR over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.