BUFM vs HTUS
AB Moderate Buffer ETF vs Hull Tactical US ETF
Which is better, BUFM or HTUS?
Each has led over a different period.
BUFM has a lower expense ratio. BUFM led over the full window, HTUS over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BUFM | HTUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.69%Best | 0.96% |
| AUM | $492M | $174M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.19% |
| Holdings | 7 | 27 |
| YTD Return | +4.67% | +15.69%Best |
| 1Y Return | +7.70% | +8.15%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.36% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +6.41% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.3%Best | 14.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -9.4%Best | -24.4% |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $11,674Best | $11,563 |
| Fund Family | AllianceBernstein L.P. | Hull Tactical Asset Allocation, LLC |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Dec 9, 2024 | Jun 24, 2015 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 10, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.8 years).
BUFM vs HTUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
BUFM vs HTUS Performance
AB Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFM) is an ETF from AllianceBernstein L.P. and Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) is an ETF from Hull Tactical Asset Allocation, LLC. Over the past year BUFM returned +7.70% while HTUS returned +8.15%. Year to date, BUFM is up 4.67% versus a gain of 15.69% for HTUS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HTUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.3% compared with 5.3% for BUFM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.4% for BUFM and -24.4% for HTUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BUFM charges 0.69% per year while HTUS charges 0.96%. On a $10,000 position that is $69 vs $96 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BUFM currently yields 0.00% against 1.19% for HTUS.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BUFM and HTUS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BUFM or HTUS?
BUFM has an expense ratio of 0.69% while HTUS charges 0.96%. BUFM is the cheaper option, by $27 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BUFM or HTUS?
Over the past year BUFM returned +7.70% vs +8.15% for HTUS, so HTUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BUFM annualized +8.98% vs +8.40% for HTUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BUFM or HTUS?
HTUS has been the more volatile fund at 14.3% annualized versus 5.3% for BUFM. Worst drawdown: BUFM -9.4% vs HTUS -24.4%.
Should I hold both BUFM and HTUS?
BUFM and HTUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BUFM or HTUS?
BUFM yields 0.00% while HTUS yields 1.19%, so HTUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is HTUS better than BUFM?
BUFM has a lower expense ratio. BUFM led over the full window, HTUS over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.