BUFM vs SSO

BUFM vs SSO

Which is better, BUFM or SSO?

SSO has been ahead.

BUFM has a lower expense ratio. SSO led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93.

Lower Fees: BUFMHigher Returns: SSO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBUFMSSO
Expense Ratio0.69%Best0.84%
AUM$492M$9.2B
Dividend Yield0.00%0.69%
Holdings7521
YTD Return+4.67%+21.98%Best
1Y Return+7.70%+28.56%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+37.60%
5Y Return (annualized)-+17.88%
Volatility (annualized)5.3%Best25.4%
Max Drawdown-9.4%Best-35.2%
$10,000 over 1.8 years$11,674$14,439Best
Fund FamilyAllianceBernstein L.P.ProShares
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleMulti AlternativeMulti Alternative
InceptionDec 9, 2024Jun 19, 2006

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 10, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.8 years).

BUFM vs SSO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.

Compare BUFM against instead:BUFM vs SPYBUFM vs QQQBUFM vs VOOBUFM vs VTISSO against:SSO vs VXUS

BUFM vs SSO Performance

AB Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFM) is an ETF from AllianceBernstein L.P. and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) is an ETF from ProShares. Over the past year BUFM returned +7.70% while SSO returned +28.56%. Year to date, BUFM is up 4.67% versus a gain of 21.98% for SSO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

SSO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 25.4% compared with 5.3% for BUFM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.4% for BUFM and -35.2% for SSO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BUFM charges 0.69% per year while SSO charges 0.84%. On a $10,000 position that is $69 vs $84 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BUFM currently yields 0.00% against 0.69% for SSO.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of BUFM and SSO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

BUFMSSO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BUFM or SSO?

BUFM has an expense ratio of 0.69% while SSO charges 0.84%. BUFM is the cheaper option, by $15 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, BUFM or SSO?

Over the past year BUFM returned +7.70% vs +28.56% for SSO, so SSO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BUFM annualized +8.98% vs +22.64% for SSO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, BUFM or SSO?

SSO has been the more volatile fund at 25.4% annualized versus 5.3% for BUFM. Worst drawdown: BUFM -9.4% vs SSO -35.2%.

Should I hold both BUFM and SSO?

BUFM and SSO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, BUFM or SSO?

BUFM yields 0.00% while SSO yields 0.69%, so SSO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is SSO better than BUFM?

BUFM has a lower expense ratio. SSO led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.