BUFM vs TSLZ
AB Moderate Buffer ETF vs T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF
Which is better, BUFM or TSLZ?
BUFM has been ahead.
BUFM has a lower expense ratio. BUFM led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BUFM | TSLZ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.69%Best | 1.05% |
| AUM | $492M | $25M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.66% |
| Holdings | 7 | 7 |
| YTD Return | +4.67%Best | -9.37% |
| 1Y Return | +7.70%Best | -23.17% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | -75.00% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.3%Best | 100.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -9.4%Best | -92.2% |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $11,674Best | $2,104 |
| Fund Family | AllianceBernstein L.P. | REX Shares |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Dec 9, 2024 | Oct 19, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 10, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.8 years).
BUFM vs TSLZ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
BUFM vs TSLZ Performance
AB Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFM) is an ETF from AllianceBernstein L.P. and T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) is an ETF from REX Shares. Over the past year BUFM returned +7.70% while TSLZ returned -23.17%. Year to date, BUFM is up 4.67% versus a loss of 9.37% for TSLZ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TSLZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 100.0% compared with 5.3% for BUFM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.4% for BUFM and -92.2% for TSLZ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.42. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BUFM charges 0.69% per year while TSLZ charges 1.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $69 vs $105 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BUFM currently yields 0.00% against 0.66% for TSLZ.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BUFM and TSLZ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BUFM or TSLZ?
BUFM has an expense ratio of 0.69% while TSLZ charges 1.05%. BUFM is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BUFM or TSLZ?
Over the past year BUFM returned +7.70% vs -23.17% for TSLZ, so BUFM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BUFM annualized +8.98% vs -57.94% for TSLZ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BUFM or TSLZ?
TSLZ has been the more volatile fund at 100.0% annualized versus 5.3% for BUFM. Worst drawdown: BUFM -9.4% vs TSLZ -92.2%.
Should I hold both BUFM and TSLZ?
BUFM and TSLZ have a monthly-return correlation of -0.42, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BUFM or TSLZ?
BUFM yields 0.00% while TSLZ yields 0.66%, so TSLZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TSLZ better than BUFM?
BUFM has a lower expense ratio. BUFM led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.