BUFQ vs XQQI
FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF vs NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
Which is better, BUFQ or XQQI?
XQQI costs less.
XQQI has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BUFQ | XQQI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.98%Best |
| AUM | $1.7B | $381M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 11.96% |
| Holdings | 10 | 213 |
| YTD Return | +12.76% | +14.06%Best |
| 1Y Return | +16.30% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.43% | - |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | NEOS |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Jun 15, 2022 | Feb 2, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
BUFQ vs XQQI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BUFQ vs XQQI Performance
FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF (BUFQ) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (XQQI) is an ETF from NEOS. Year to date, BUFQ is up 12.76% versus a gain of 14.06% for XQQI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BUFQ charges 1.00% per year while XQQI charges 0.98%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $98 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BUFQ currently yields 0.00% against 11.96% for XQQI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 4 holdings in BUFQ and 102 in XQQI, totalling 100.0% and 100.8% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 4 positions we hold weights for in BUFQ and 102 in XQQI, against full books of 10 and 213.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BUFQ and XQQI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BUFQ or XQQI?
BUFQ has an expense ratio of 1.00% while XQQI charges 0.98%. XQQI is the cheaper option, by $2 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, BUFQ or XQQI?
BUFQ yields 0.00% while XQQI yields 11.96%, so XQQI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XQQI better than BUFQ?
XQQI has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.