BUFR vs FJUL

BUFR vs FJUL

Which is better, BUFR or FJUL?

Nearly the same fund. FJUL costs less.

FJUL has a lower expense ratio. BUFR led over 1Y, FJUL over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99.

Lower Fees: FJULHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBUFRFJUL
Expense Ratio0.95%0.85%Best
AUM$10.9B$1.4B
Dividend Yield0.00%0.00%
Holdings2610
YTD Return+10.03%+10.19%Best
1Y Return+13.37%Best+13.14%
3Y Return (annualized)+14.92%+16.61%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+10.16%+11.81%Best
Volatility (annualized)9.3%Best9.8%
Max Drawdown-13.7%-13.1%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$16,223$17,474Best
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)First Trust Portfolios (US)
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleOption WritingOption Writing
InceptionAug 10, 2020Jul 16, 2020

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 11, 2020 to Oct 14, 2026 (6.2 years).

BUFR vs FJUL growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.2 years both funds cover.

Compare BUFR against instead:BUFR vs SPYBUFR vs QQQBUFR vs VOOBUFR vs VTIFJUL against:FJUL vs VXUS

BUFR vs FJUL Performance

FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF (BUFR) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF - July (FJUL) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year BUFR returned +13.37% while FJUL returned +13.14%. Year to date, BUFR is up 10.03% versus a gain of 10.19% for FJUL.

Over three years, BUFR compounded at +14.92% per year against +16.61% for FJUL; over five years the annualized figures are +10.16% and +11.81% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, FJUL has the edge at +11.80% annualized vs +10.86%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

FJUL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 9.8% compared with 9.3% for BUFR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.7% for BUFR and -13.1% for FJUL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BUFR charges 0.95% per year while FJUL charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $85 annually, a gap of $10 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BUFR currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for FJUL.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of BUFR and FJUL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

BUFRFJUL

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BUFR or FJUL?

BUFR has an expense ratio of 0.95% while FJUL charges 0.85%. FJUL is the cheaper option, by $10 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, BUFR or FJUL?

Over the past year BUFR returned +13.37% vs +13.14% for FJUL, so BUFR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), BUFR annualized +10.86% vs +11.80% for FJUL. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, BUFR or FJUL?

FJUL has been the more volatile fund at 9.8% annualized versus 9.3% for BUFR. Worst drawdown: BUFR -13.7% vs FJUL -13.1%.

Should I hold both BUFR and FJUL?

BUFR and FJUL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, BUFR or FJUL?

BUFR yields 0.00% while FJUL yields 0.00%, so FJUL currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is FJUL better than BUFR?

FJUL has a lower expense ratio. BUFR led over 1Y, FJUL over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.