BUFR vs QDCC
FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF vs Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend Covered Call ETF
Which is better, BUFR or QDCC?
BUFR has been ahead.
QDCC has a lower expense ratio. BUFR led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BUFR | QDCC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.35%Best |
| AUM | $10.9B | $2M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 10.87% |
| Holdings | 26 | 4 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.9%Best | 7.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -12.8%Best | -13.9% |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $11,686Best | $10,741 |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Global X by mirae Asset |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Option Writing | Option Writing |
| Inception | Aug 10, 2020 | May 7, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 418 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. BUFR has data through Oct 14, 2026 and QDCC through Aug 22, 2025.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 8, 2024 to Aug 22, 2025 (1.3 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QDCC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 7.8% compared with 6.9% for BUFR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.8% for BUFR and -13.9% for QDCC. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.45. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BUFR charges 0.95% per year while QDCC charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $35 annually, a gap of $60 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BUFR currently yields 0.00% against 10.87% for QDCC.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BUFR and QDCC you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BUFR or QDCC?
BUFR has an expense ratio of 0.95% while QDCC charges 0.35%. QDCC is the cheaper option, by $60 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, BUFR or QDCC?
QDCC has been the more volatile fund at 7.8% annualized versus 6.9% for BUFR. Worst drawdown: BUFR -12.8% vs QDCC -13.9%.
Should I hold both BUFR and QDCC?
BUFR and QDCC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.45, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BUFR or QDCC?
BUFR yields 0.00% while QDCC yields 10.87%, so QDCC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QDCC better than BUFR?
QDCC has a lower expense ratio. BUFR led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.