BUFR vs XBFR
FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF vs Innovator Equity Managed 10 Buffer ETF
Which is better, BUFR or XBFR?
XBFR costs less.
XBFR has a lower expense ratio. XBFR is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 83.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BUFR | XBFR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.79%Best |
| AUM | $10.9B | $52M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.10% |
| Holdings | 26 | 400 |
| YTD Return | +10.03%Best | +7.92% |
| 1Y Return | +13.37% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.92% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.16% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 83.3% | 38.9%Best |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Innovator ETFs Trust |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Option Writing | Option Writing |
| Inception | Aug 10, 2020 | Feb 24, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
BUFR vs XBFR growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BUFR vs XBFR Performance
FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF (BUFR) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Innovator Equity Managed 10 Buffer ETF (XBFR) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Year to date, BUFR is up 10.03% versus a gain of 7.92% for XBFR.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BUFR charges 0.95% per year while XBFR charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $79 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BUFR currently yields 0.00% against 0.10% for XBFR.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 12 holdings in BUFR and 182 in XBFR, totalling 99.9% and 97.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 12 positions we hold weights for in BUFR and 182 in XBFR, against full books of 26 and 400.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 174 positions for XBFR that do not appear in our book for BUFR (95.9% of the fund), and 12 for BUFR that do not appear in XBFR (99.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BUFR and XBFR you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BUFR or XBFR?
BUFR has an expense ratio of 0.95% while XBFR charges 0.79%. XBFR is the cheaper option, by $16 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, BUFR or XBFR?
BUFR yields 0.00% while XBFR yields 0.10%, so XBFR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XBFR better than BUFR?
XBFR has a lower expense ratio. XBFR is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 83.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.