BUI vs ECML
BlackRock Utility Infrastructure & Power Opportunities Trust vs Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF
Which is better, BUI or ECML?
Each has led over a different period.
ECML has a lower expense ratio. BUI led over 3Y, ECML over 1Y and the full window. ECML is less concentrated, with 20.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BUI | ECML |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.07% | 0.95%Best |
| AUM | $687M | $126M |
| Dividend Yield | 10.99% | 1.17% |
| Holdings | 54 | 130 |
| YTD Return | +3.71% | +18.99%Best |
| 1Y Return | +6.35% | +24.66%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.33%Best | +14.57% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.84% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.1%Best | 18.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.3%Best | -25.4% |
| $10,000 over 3.4 years | $14,948 | $16,212Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 39.6% | 20.7%Best |
| Fund Family | BlackRock, Inc. (US) | Euclidean Technologies |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Nov 23, 2011 | May 18, 2023 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 18, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.4 years).
BUI vs ECML growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.4 years both funds cover.
BUI vs ECML Performance
BlackRock Utility Infrastructure & Power Opportunities Trust (BUI) is an ETF from BlackRock, Inc. (US) and Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML) is an ETF from Euclidean Technologies. Over the past year BUI returned +6.35% while ECML returned +24.66%. Year to date, BUI is up 3.71% versus a gain of 18.99% for ECML.
Over three years, BUI compounded at +15.33% per year against +14.57% for ECML.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ECML has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.8% compared with 17.1% for BUI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.3% for BUI and -25.4% for ECML. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.51. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BUI charges 1.07% per year while ECML charges 0.95%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $95 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BUI currently yields 10.99% against 1.17% for ECML.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 54 holdings in BUI and 64 in ECML, totalling 101.1% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 93 days apart, BUI as of Jun 30, 2026 and ECML as of Oct 1, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in BUI and 64 in ECML, against full books of 54 and 130.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 63 positions for ECML that do not appear in our book for BUI (98.4% of the fund), and 32 for BUI that do not appear in ECML (69.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BUI and ECML you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BUI or ECML?
BUI has an expense ratio of 1.07% while ECML charges 0.95%. ECML is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BUI or ECML?
Over the past year BUI returned +6.35% vs +24.66% for ECML, so ECML leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BUI or ECML?
ECML has been the more volatile fund at 18.8% annualized versus 17.1% for BUI. Worst drawdown: BUI -18.3% vs ECML -25.4%.
Should I hold both BUI and ECML?
BUI and ECML have a monthly-return correlation of 0.51, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BUI or ECML?
BUI yields 10.99% while ECML yields 1.17%, so BUI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ECML better than BUI?
ECML has a lower expense ratio. BUI led over 3Y, ECML over 1Y and the full window. ECML is less concentrated, with 20.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.