BUI vs FDIV
BlackRock Utility Infrastructure & Power Opportunities Trust vs MarketDesk Focused US Dividend ETF
Which is better, BUI or FDIV?
BUI has been ahead.
FDIV has a lower expense ratio. BUI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. FDIV is less concentrated, with 33.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BUI | FDIV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.07% | 0.35%Best |
| AUM | $687M | $53M |
| Dividend Yield | 10.99% | 2.61% |
| Holdings | 54 | 224 |
| YTD Return | +3.71%Best | -0.05% |
| 1Y Return | +6.35%Best | +2.12% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.33%Best | +6.26% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.84% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.6% | 12.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -17.2%Best | -18.6% |
| $10,000 over 3.1 years | $15,703Best | $11,722 |
| Top 10 Weight | 39.6% | 33.0%Best |
| Fund Family | BlackRock, Inc. (US) | MarketDesk Indices |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Nov 23, 2011 | Sep 19, 2023 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 20, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.1 years).
BUI vs FDIV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.1 years both funds cover.
BUI vs FDIV Performance
BlackRock Utility Infrastructure & Power Opportunities Trust (BUI) is an ETF from BlackRock, Inc. (US) and MarketDesk Focused US Dividend ETF (FDIV) is an ETF from MarketDesk Indices. Over the past year BUI returned +6.35% while FDIV returned +2.12%. Year to date, BUI is up 3.71% versus a loss of 0.05% for FDIV.
Over three years, BUI compounded at +15.33% per year against +6.26% for FDIV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BUI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.6% compared with 12.8% for FDIV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.2% for BUI and -18.6% for FDIV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BUI charges 1.07% per year while FDIV charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $35 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BUI currently yields 10.99% against 2.61% for FDIV.
Holdings Overlap
22.4% of BUI's money is in holdings FDIV also owns. 4.8% of FDIV's money is in holdings BUI also owns.
BUI and FDIV share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 93 days apart, BUI as of Jun 30, 2026 and FDIV as of Oct 1, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
9 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in BUI and 111 in FDIV, against full books of 54 and 224.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 97 positions for FDIV that do not appear in our book for BUI (93.1% of the fund), and 23 for BUI that do not appear in FDIV (47.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BUI | Weight in FDIV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NEENextera Energy Inc | 6.17% | 1.44% | 4.73% |
| AEPAmerican Electric Power Co Inc | 3.46% | 0.58% | 2.88% |
| DDominion Energy Inc. | 2.85% | 0.47% | 2.38% |
| SRESempra Common Stock | 2.81% | 0.45% | 2.36% |
| XELXcel Energy Inc. | 2.20% | 0.40% | 1.80% |
| FEFirstenergy Corp | 1.74% | 0.21% | 1.53% |
| NINisource Inc. | 1.67% | 0.17% | 1.50% |
| TTTt Trane Technologies Plc | 0.75% | 0.92% | 0.17% |
| HUBBHubbell Inc | 0.74% | 0.21% | 0.53% |
22.4% of BUI is already inside FDIV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BUI or FDIV?
BUI has an expense ratio of 1.07% while FDIV charges 0.35%. FDIV is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BUI or FDIV?
Over the past year BUI returned +6.35% vs +2.12% for FDIV, so BUI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BUI or FDIV?
BUI has been the more volatile fund at 16.6% annualized versus 12.8% for FDIV. Worst drawdown: BUI -17.2% vs FDIV -18.6%.
Should I hold both BUI and FDIV?
BUI and FDIV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BUI and FDIV?
22.4% of BUI's money is in holdings FDIV also owns. 4.8% of FDIV's is in holdings BUI also owns. They hold 9 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in BUI and 111 in FDIV.
Which pays a higher dividend, BUI or FDIV?
BUI yields 10.99% while FDIV yields 2.61%, so BUI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FDIV better than BUI?
FDIV has a lower expense ratio. BUI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. FDIV is less concentrated, with 33.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.