BUI vs LSVD
BlackRock Utility Infrastructure & Power Opportunities Trust vs LSV Disciplined Value ETF
Which is better, BUI or LSVD?
LSVD has been ahead.
LSVD has a lower expense ratio. LSVD led over 1Y and the full window. LSVD is less concentrated, with 35.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BUI | LSVD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.07% | 0.40%Best |
| AUM | $687M | $678M |
| Dividend Yield | 10.99% | 0.27% |
| Holdings | 54 | 136 |
| YTD Return | +3.71% | +20.92%Best |
| 1Y Return | +6.35% | +30.07%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.33% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.84% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.5% | 13.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -17.2%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $13,223 | $14,810Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 39.6% | 35.0%Best |
| Fund Family | BlackRock, Inc. (US) | LSV Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Nov 23, 2011 | Dec 17, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 18, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.8 years).
BUI vs LSVD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
BUI vs LSVD Performance
BlackRock Utility Infrastructure & Power Opportunities Trust (BUI) is an ETF from BlackRock, Inc. (US) and LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD) is an ETF from LSV Asset Management. Over the past year BUI returned +6.35% while LSVD returned +30.07%. Year to date, BUI is up 3.71% versus a gain of 20.92% for LSVD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BUI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.5% compared with 13.3% for LSVD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.2% for BUI and -19.3% for LSVD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.34. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BUI charges 1.07% per year while LSVD charges 0.40%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $40 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BUI currently yields 10.99% against 0.27% for LSVD.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 54 holdings in BUI and 135 in LSVD, totalling 101.1% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 93 days apart, BUI as of Jun 30, 2026 and LSVD as of Oct 1, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in BUI and 135 in LSVD, against full books of 54 and 136.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 133 positions for LSVD that do not appear in our book for BUI (99.6% of the fund), and 32 for BUI that do not appear in LSVD (69.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BUI and LSVD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BUI or LSVD?
BUI has an expense ratio of 1.07% while LSVD charges 0.40%. LSVD is the cheaper option, by $67 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BUI or LSVD?
Over the past year BUI returned +6.35% vs +30.07% for LSVD, so LSVD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BUI annualized +16.79% vs +24.38% for LSVD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BUI or LSVD?
BUI has been the more volatile fund at 18.5% annualized versus 13.3% for LSVD. Worst drawdown: BUI -17.2% vs LSVD -19.3%.
Should I hold both BUI and LSVD?
BUI and LSVD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.34, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BUI or LSVD?
BUI yields 10.99% while LSVD yields 0.27%, so BUI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is LSVD better than BUI?
LSVD has a lower expense ratio. LSVD led over 1Y and the full window. LSVD is less concentrated, with 35.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.