BUI vs SCHV
BlackRock Utility Infrastructure & Power Opportunities Trust vs Schwab US Large-Cap Value ETF
Which is better, BUI or SCHV?
SCHV has been ahead.
SCHV has a lower expense ratio. SCHV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. SCHV is less concentrated, with 20.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BUI | SCHV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.07% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $687M | $15.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 10.99% | 1.88% |
| Holdings | 54 | 560 |
| YTD Return | +3.71% | +15.04%Best |
| 1Y Return | +6.35% | +19.24%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.33% | +19.07%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.84% | +10.35%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.6% | 13.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -48.3% | -37.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,585 | $16,363Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 39.6% | 20.0%Best |
| Fund Family | BlackRock, Inc. (US) | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Nov 23, 2011 | Dec 11, 2009 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 23, 2011 to Oct 14, 2026 (14.9 years).
BUI vs SCHV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 14.9 years both funds cover.
BUI vs SCHV Performance
BlackRock Utility Infrastructure & Power Opportunities Trust (BUI) is an ETF from BlackRock, Inc. (US) and Schwab US Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year BUI returned +6.35% while SCHV returned +19.24%. Year to date, BUI is up 3.71% versus a gain of 15.04% for SCHV.
Over three years, BUI compounded at +15.33% per year against +19.07% for SCHV; over five years the annualized figures are +7.84% and +10.35% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, SCHV has the edge at +10.56% annualized vs +4.44%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BUI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.6% compared with 13.8% for SCHV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -48.3% for BUI and -37.1% for SCHV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BUI charges 1.07% per year while SCHV charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $4 annually, a gap of $103 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BUI currently yields 10.99% against 1.88% for SCHV.
Holdings Overlap
55.1% of BUI's money is in holdings SCHV also owns. 4.4% of SCHV's money is in holdings BUI also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 95 days apart, BUI as of Jun 30, 2026 and SCHV as of Oct 3, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
19 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in BUI and 567 in SCHV, against full books of 54 and 560.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 537 positions for SCHV that do not appear in our book for BUI (94.7% of the fund), and 13 for BUI that do not appear in SCHV (14.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BUI | Weight in SCHV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NEENextera Energy Inc | 6.17% | 0.54% | 5.63% |
| UNPUnion Pacific Corp | 4.11% | 0.56% | 3.55% |
| WMBWilliams Cos. Inc. | 4.17% | 0.29% | 3.88% |
| SOSouthern Co. | 3.94% | 0.33% | 3.61% |
| DUKDuke Energy Corp | 3.96% | 0.30% | 3.66% |
| SPCXSpace Exploration Technologies | 3.02% | 0.74% | 2.28% |
| AEPAmerican Electric Power Co Inc | 3.46% | 0.22% | 3.24% |
| LNGCheniere Energy Inc. | 2.94% | 0.19% | 2.75% |
| DDominion Energy Inc. | 2.85% | 0.18% | 2.67% |
| SRESempra Common Stock | 2.81% | 0.17% | 2.64% |
55.1% of BUI is already inside SCHV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BUI or SCHV?
BUI has an expense ratio of 1.07% while SCHV charges 0.04%. SCHV is the cheaper option, by $103 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BUI or SCHV?
Over the past year BUI returned +6.35% vs +19.24% for SCHV, so SCHV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), BUI annualized +4.44% vs +10.56% for SCHV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BUI or SCHV?
BUI has been the more volatile fund at 16.6% annualized versus 13.8% for SCHV. Worst drawdown: BUI -48.3% vs SCHV -37.1%.
Should I hold both BUI and SCHV?
BUI and SCHV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BUI and SCHV?
55.1% of BUI's money is in holdings SCHV also owns. 4.4% of SCHV's is in holdings BUI also owns. They hold 19 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in BUI and 567 in SCHV.
Which pays a higher dividend, BUI or SCHV?
BUI yields 10.99% while SCHV yields 1.88%, so BUI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHV better than BUI?
SCHV has a lower expense ratio. SCHV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. SCHV is less concentrated, with 20.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.