BUI vs SIXA
BlackRock Utility Infrastructure & Power Opportunities Trust vs ETC 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF
Which is better, BUI or SIXA?
SIXA has been ahead.
SIXA has a lower expense ratio. SIXA led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. SIXA is less concentrated, with 34.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BUI | SIXA |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.07% | 0.47%Best |
| AUM | $687M | $540M |
| Dividend Yield | 10.99% | 1.96% |
| Holdings | 54 | 150 |
| YTD Return | +3.71% | +16.78%Best |
| 1Y Return | +6.35% | +19.27%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.33% | +21.22%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.84% | +12.90%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.0% | 12.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -27.4% | -18.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,585 | $18,343Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 39.6% | 34.8%Best |
| Fund Family | BlackRock, Inc. (US) | 6 Meridian ETF |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Nov 23, 2011 | May 11, 2020 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 11, 2020 to Oct 14, 2026 (6.4 years).
BUI vs SIXA growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.4 years both funds cover.
BUI vs SIXA Performance
BlackRock Utility Infrastructure & Power Opportunities Trust (BUI) is an ETF from BlackRock, Inc. (US) and ETC 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA) is an ETF from 6 Meridian ETF. Over the past year BUI returned +6.35% while SIXA returned +19.27%. Year to date, BUI is up 3.71% versus a gain of 16.78% for SIXA.
Over three years, BUI compounded at +15.33% per year against +21.22% for SIXA; over five years the annualized figures are +7.84% and +12.90% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, SIXA has the edge at +15.46% annualized vs +11.45%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BUI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.0% compared with 12.6% for SIXA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.4% for BUI and -18.4% for SIXA. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BUI charges 1.07% per year while SIXA charges 0.47%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $47 annually, a gap of $60 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BUI currently yields 10.99% against 1.96% for SIXA.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 54 holdings in BUI and 50 in SIXA, totalling 101.1% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 93 days apart, BUI as of Jun 30, 2026 and SIXA as of Oct 1, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in BUI and 50 in SIXA, against full books of 54 and 150.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 50 positions for SIXA that do not appear in our book for BUI (100.0% of the fund), and 32 for BUI that do not appear in SIXA (69.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BUI and SIXA you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BUI or SIXA?
BUI has an expense ratio of 1.07% while SIXA charges 0.47%. SIXA is the cheaper option, by $60 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BUI or SIXA?
Over the past year BUI returned +6.35% vs +19.27% for SIXA, so SIXA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), BUI annualized +11.45% vs +15.46% for SIXA. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BUI or SIXA?
BUI has been the more volatile fund at 18.0% annualized versus 12.6% for SIXA. Worst drawdown: BUI -27.4% vs SIXA -18.4%.
Should I hold both BUI and SIXA?
BUI and SIXA have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BUI or SIXA?
BUI yields 10.99% while SIXA yields 1.96%, so BUI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SIXA better than BUI?
SIXA has a lower expense ratio. SIXA led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. SIXA is less concentrated, with 34.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.