BUSM vs TSCV
EA Bridgeway Ultra-Small Company Market ETF vs Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF
Which is better, BUSM or TSCV?
BUSM has been ahead.
TSCV has a lower expense ratio. BUSM led over 1Y. BUSM is less concentrated, with 6.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 23.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BUSM | TSCV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.73% | 0.60%Best |
| AUM | $115M | $171M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.26% |
| Holdings | 585 | 120 |
| YTD Return | -7.05% | +9.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +16.90% |
| Top 10 Weight | 6.0%Best | 23.2% |
| Fund Family | Bridgeway Funds | Thrivent Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Value | Small Cap Value |
| Inception | Jul 24, 2026 | Nov 17, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
BUSM vs TSCV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BUSM vs TSCV Performance
EA Bridgeway Ultra-Small Company Market ETF (BUSM) is an ETF from Bridgeway Funds and Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF (TSCV) is an ETF from Thrivent Funds. Year to date, BUSM is down 7.05% versus a gain of 9.02% for TSCV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BUSM charges 0.73% per year while TSCV charges 0.60%. On a $10,000 position that is $73 vs $60 annually, a gap of $13 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BUSM currently yields 0.00% against 0.26% for TSCV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 538 holdings in BUSM and 58 in TSCV, totalling 99.6% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 538 positions we hold weights for in BUSM and 58 in TSCV, against full books of 585 and 120.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 55 positions for TSCV that do not appear in our book for BUSM (93.8% of the fund), and 531 for BUSM that do not appear in TSCV (99.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BUSM and TSCV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BUSM or TSCV?
BUSM has an expense ratio of 0.73% while TSCV charges 0.60%. TSCV is the cheaper option, by $13 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, BUSM or TSCV?
BUSM yields 0.00% while TSCV yields 0.26%, so TSCV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TSCV better than BUSM?
TSCV has a lower expense ratio. BUSM led over 1Y. BUSM is less concentrated, with 6.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 23.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.