BUYB vs IVV
ProShares S&P 500 Buyback Aristocrats ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, BUYB or IVV?
IVV costs less.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. BUYB is less concentrated, with 17.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BUYB | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $26M | $896.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.30% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 68 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +7.26% | +13.59%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +17.54% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.46% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.28% |
| Top 10 Weight | 17.6%Best | 38.9% |
| Fund Family | ProShares | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 6, 2026 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
BUYB vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BUYB vs IVV Performance
ProShares S&P 500 Buyback Aristocrats ETF (BUYB) is an ETF from ProShares and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, BUYB is up 7.26% versus a gain of 13.59% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BUYB charges 0.39% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BUYB currently yields 0.30% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
99.7% of BUYB's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 18.5% of IVV's money is in holdings BUYB also owns.
Most of BUYB is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
68 positions in common, counted across the 68 positions we hold weights for in BUYB and 506 in IVV, against full books of 68 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 68 and 506 positions we hold weights for.
IVV holds 432 positions BUYB does not, 81.0% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 8.44%, MSFT 5.76%, AMZN 3.68%, GOOGL 3.00%, AVGO 2.47%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BUYB | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 1.56% | 7.29% | 5.73% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 1.47% | 1.34% | 0.13% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.37% | 1.39% | 0.02% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 1.52% | 0.93% | 0.59% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 1.56% | 0.67% | 0.89% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.44% | 0.65% | 0.79% |
| CTSHCognizant Technology Solutions Corp. Class A | 2.02% | 0.04% | 1.98% |
| WMTWalmart, Inc. | 1.35% | 0.70% | 0.65% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 1.39% | 0.64% | 0.75% |
| AAgilent Technologies Inc | 1.91% | 0.07% | 1.84% |
99.7% of BUYB is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BUYB or IVV?
BUYB has an expense ratio of 0.39% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between BUYB and IVV?
99.7% of BUYB's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 18.5% of IVV's is in holdings BUYB also owns. They hold 68 positions in common, counted across the 68 positions we hold weights for in BUYB and 506 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, BUYB or IVV?
BUYB yields 0.30% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than BUYB?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. BUYB is less concentrated, with 17.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.