BWTG vs FMTM
Brendan Wood TopGun ETF vs MarketDesk Focused US Momentum ETF
Which is better, BWTG or FMTM?
FMTM has been ahead.
FMTM has a lower expense ratio. FMTM led over 1Y and the full window. FMTM is less concentrated, with 34.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BWTG | FMTM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.45%Best |
| AUM | $21M | $284M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.33% | 0.24% |
| Holdings | 42 | 86 |
| YTD Return | +5.61% | +19.82%Best |
| 1Y Return | +10.02% | +33.28%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.00% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.4%Best | 19.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -9.9%Best | -15.4% |
| $10,000 over 1.6 years | $12,187 | $15,915Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 56.7% | 34.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Brendan Wood TopGun | MarketDesk Indices |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Mid Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 9, 2023 | Mar 20, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 20, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.6 years).
BWTG vs FMTM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.6 years both funds cover.
BWTG vs FMTM Performance
Brendan Wood TopGun ETF (BWTG) is an ETF from Brendan Wood TopGun and MarketDesk Focused US Momentum ETF (FMTM) is an ETF from MarketDesk Indices. Over the past year BWTG returned +10.02% while FMTM returned +33.28%. Year to date, BWTG is up 5.61% versus a gain of 19.82% for FMTM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FMTM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.8% compared with 10.4% for BWTG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.9% for BWTG and -15.4% for FMTM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BWTG charges 0.95% per year while FMTM charges 0.45%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $45 annually, a gap of $50 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BWTG currently yields 0.33% against 0.24% for FMTM.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 20 holdings in BWTG and 31 in FMTM, totalling 99.2% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 20 positions we hold weights for in BWTG and 31 in FMTM, against full books of 42 and 86.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 31 positions for FMTM that do not appear in our book for BWTG (100.0% of the fund), and 15 for BWTG that do not appear in FMTM (74.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BWTG and FMTM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BWTG or FMTM?
BWTG has an expense ratio of 0.95% while FMTM charges 0.45%. FMTM is the cheaper option, by $50 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BWTG or FMTM?
Over the past year BWTG returned +10.02% vs +33.28% for FMTM, so FMTM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BWTG annualized +13.16% vs +33.70% for FMTM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BWTG or FMTM?
FMTM has been the more volatile fund at 19.8% annualized versus 10.4% for BWTG. Worst drawdown: BWTG -9.9% vs FMTM -15.4%.
Should I hold both BWTG and FMTM?
BWTG and FMTM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BWTG or FMTM?
BWTG yields 0.33% while FMTM yields 0.24%, so BWTG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FMTM better than BWTG?
FMTM has a lower expense ratio. FMTM led over 1Y and the full window. FMTM is less concentrated, with 34.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.