BWTG vs SCHM
Brendan Wood TopGun ETF vs Schwab US Mid Cap ETF
Which is better, BWTG or SCHM?
Each has led over a different period.
SCHM has a lower expense ratio. BWTG led over 3Y and the full window, SCHM over 1Y. SCHM is less concentrated, with 5.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BWTG | SCHM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $21M | $14.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.33% | 1.31% |
| Holdings | 42 | 495 |
| YTD Return | +5.61% | +12.80%Best |
| 1Y Return | +10.02% | +16.12%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.00%Best | +16.61% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +6.70% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.8%Best | 15.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -13.2%Best | -23.3% |
| $10,000 over 2.9 years | $16,561Best | $16,308 |
| Top 10 Weight | 56.7% | 5.0%Best |
| Fund Family | Brendan Wood TopGun | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Mid Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 9, 2023 | Jan 13, 2011 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 9, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.9 years).
BWTG vs SCHM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.9 years both funds cover.
BWTG vs SCHM Performance
Brendan Wood TopGun ETF (BWTG) is an ETF from Brendan Wood TopGun and Schwab US Mid Cap ETF (SCHM) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year BWTG returned +10.02% while SCHM returned +16.12%. Year to date, BWTG is up 5.61% versus a gain of 12.80% for SCHM.
Over three years, BWTG compounded at +19.00% per year against +16.61% for SCHM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCHM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.5% compared with 11.8% for BWTG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.2% for BWTG and -23.3% for SCHM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BWTG charges 0.95% per year while SCHM charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BWTG currently yields 0.33% against 1.31% for SCHM.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 20 holdings in BWTG and 502 in SCHM, totalling 99.2% and 99.7% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 20 positions we hold weights for in BWTG and 502 in SCHM, against full books of 42 and 495.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 494 positions for SCHM that do not appear in our book for BWTG (98.6% of the fund), and 15 for BWTG that do not appear in SCHM (74.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BWTG and SCHM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BWTG or SCHM?
BWTG has an expense ratio of 0.95% while SCHM charges 0.03%. SCHM is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BWTG or SCHM?
Over the past year BWTG returned +10.02% vs +16.12% for SCHM, so SCHM leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BWTG or SCHM?
SCHM has been the more volatile fund at 15.5% annualized versus 11.8% for BWTG. Worst drawdown: BWTG -13.2% vs SCHM -23.3%.
Should I hold both BWTG and SCHM?
BWTG and SCHM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BWTG or SCHM?
BWTG yields 0.33% while SCHM yields 1.31%, so SCHM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHM better than BWTG?
SCHM has a lower expense ratio. BWTG led over 3Y and the full window, SCHM over 1Y. SCHM is less concentrated, with 5.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.