CAMX vs GAIQ

CAMX vs GAIQ

Which is better, CAMX or GAIQ?

CAMX costs less.

CAMX has a lower expense ratio. GAIQ is less concentrated, with 37.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.0%.

Lower Fees: CAMXLess Concentrated: GAIQ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCAMXGAIQ
Expense Ratio0.59%Best0.79%
AUM$66M$657,287.68
Dividend Yield1.44%0.00%
Holdings7030
YTD Return+7.19%Best-0.11%
1Y Return+10.86%-
3Y Return (annualized)+12.61%-
Top 10 Weight41.0%37.1%Best
Fund FamilyCambiar Investors, LLCGuinness Atkinson Funds
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionFeb 13, 2023Aug 12, 2026

Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

CAMX vs GAIQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare CAMX against instead:CAMX vs SPYCAMX vs QQQCAMX vs VOOCAMX vs VTIGAIQ against:GAIQ vs VXUS

CAMX vs GAIQ Performance

Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF (CAMX) is an ETF from Cambiar Investors, LLC and Guinness Atkinson Global Innovators Fund ETF (GAIQ) is an ETF from Guinness Atkinson Funds. Year to date, CAMX is up 7.19% versus a loss of 0.11% for GAIQ.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

CAMX charges 0.59% per year while GAIQ charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $79 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CAMX currently yields 1.44% against 0.00% for GAIQ.

Holdings Overlap

CAMX already in GAIQ12.9%
GAIQ already in CAMX13.6%

12.9% of CAMX's money is in holdings GAIQ also owns. 13.6% of GAIQ's money is in holdings CAMX also owns.

GAIQ and CAMX share little of their money.

4 positions in common, counted across the 33 positions we hold weights for in CAMX and 31 in GAIQ, against full books of 70 and 30.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 19 positions for GAIQ that do not appear in our book for CAMX (64.0% of the fund), and 26 for CAMX that do not appear in GAIQ (76.5%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in CAMXWeight in GAIQDifference
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc3.30%3.78%0.48%
MDTMedtronic Plc Ordinary Shares3.89%3.12%0.77%
ICEIntercontinental Exchange Grp Usd0.013.16%3.32%0.16%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc2.54%3.36%0.82%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of CAMX and GAIQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

CAMXGAIQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, CAMX or GAIQ?

CAMX has an expense ratio of 0.59% while GAIQ charges 0.79%. CAMX is the cheaper option, by $20 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between CAMX and GAIQ?

13.6% of GAIQ's money is in holdings CAMX also owns. 13.6% of GAIQ's is in holdings CAMX also owns. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 33 positions we hold weights for in CAMX and 31 in GAIQ.

Which pays a higher dividend, CAMX or GAIQ?

CAMX yields 1.44% while GAIQ yields 0.00%, so CAMX currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is GAIQ better than CAMX?

CAMX has a lower expense ratio. GAIQ is less concentrated, with 37.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.