CAMX vs RGLO
Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF vs Russell Investments Global Equity ETF
Which is better, CAMX or RGLO?
RGLO has been ahead.
RGLO has a lower expense ratio. RGLO led over 1Y and the full window. RGLO is less concentrated, with 26.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CAMX | RGLO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.49%Best |
| AUM | $66M | $368M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.44% | 0.57% |
| Holdings | 70 | 384 |
| YTD Return | +9.34% | +12.16%Best |
| 1Y Return | +12.98% | +17.93%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.34% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.5% | 9.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -11.8% | -9.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.4 years | $11,800 | $13,249Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.0% | 26.2%Best |
| Fund Family | Cambiar Investors, LLC | Russell Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 13, 2023 | May 29, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 30, 2025 to Oct 15, 2026 (1.4 years).
CAMX vs RGLO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.4 years both funds cover.
CAMX vs RGLO Performance
Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF (CAMX) is an ETF from Cambiar Investors, LLC and Russell Investments Global Equity ETF (RGLO) is an ETF from Russell Investments. Over the past year CAMX returned +12.98% while RGLO returned +17.93%. Year to date, CAMX is up 9.34% versus a gain of 12.16% for RGLO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CAMX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.5% compared with 9.9% for RGLO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.8% for CAMX and -9.6% for RGLO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CAMX charges 0.59% per year while RGLO charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $49 annually, a gap of $10 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CAMX currently yields 1.44% against 0.57% for RGLO.
Holdings Overlap
13.7% of CAMX's money is in holdings RGLO also owns. 2.6% of RGLO's money is in holdings CAMX also owns.
CAMX and RGLO share little of their money.
4 positions in common, counted across the 33 positions we hold weights for in CAMX and 346 in RGLO, against full books of 70 and 384.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 106 positions for RGLO that do not appear in our book for CAMX (49.1% of the fund), and 26 for CAMX that do not appear in RGLO (75.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CAMX and RGLO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CAMX or RGLO?
CAMX has an expense ratio of 0.59% while RGLO charges 0.49%. RGLO is the cheaper option, by $10 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CAMX or RGLO?
Over the past year CAMX returned +12.98% vs +17.93% for RGLO, so RGLO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), CAMX annualized +12.55% vs +22.26% for RGLO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CAMX or RGLO?
CAMX has been the more volatile fund at 15.5% annualized versus 9.9% for RGLO. Worst drawdown: CAMX -11.8% vs RGLO -9.6%.
Should I hold both CAMX and RGLO?
CAMX and RGLO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CAMX and RGLO?
13.7% of CAMX's money is in holdings RGLO also owns. 2.6% of RGLO's is in holdings CAMX also owns. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 33 positions we hold weights for in CAMX and 346 in RGLO.
Which pays a higher dividend, CAMX or RGLO?
CAMX yields 1.44% while RGLO yields 0.57%, so CAMX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RGLO better than CAMX?
RGLO has a lower expense ratio. RGLO led over 1Y and the full window. RGLO is less concentrated, with 26.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.