CANC vs RWLC
Tema Oncology ETF vs Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor US Equity ETF
Which is better, CANC or RWLC?
CANC has been ahead.
RWLC has a lower expense ratio. CANC led over 1Y. RWLC is less concentrated, with 37.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CANC | RWLC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.32%Best |
| AUM | $197M | $100M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.05% | 12.70% |
| Holdings | 118 | 208 |
| YTD Return | +14.86% | +18.51%Best |
| 1Y Return | +34.85% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.41% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.0% | 37.2%Best |
| Fund Family | Tema Global Limited | The Advisors Inner Circle Fund |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 15, 2023 | Dec 15, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
CANC vs RWLC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
CANC vs RWLC Performance
Tema Oncology ETF (CANC) is an ETF from Tema Global Limited and Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor US Equity ETF (RWLC) is an ETF from The Advisors Inner Circle Fund. Year to date, CANC is up 14.86% versus a gain of 18.51% for RWLC.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CANC charges 0.75% per year while RWLC charges 0.32%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $32 annually, a gap of $43 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CANC currently yields 0.05% against 12.70% for RWLC.
Holdings Overlap
17.3% of CANC's money is in holdings RWLC also owns. 5.9% of RWLC's money is in holdings CANC also owns.
CANC and RWLC share little of their money.
5 positions in common, counted across the 59 positions we hold weights for in CANC and 101 in RWLC, against full books of 118 and 208.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 94 positions for RWLC that do not appear in our book for CANC (92.9% of the fund), and 44 for CANC that do not appear in RWLC (63.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CANC and RWLC you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CANC or RWLC?
CANC has an expense ratio of 0.75% while RWLC charges 0.32%. RWLC is the cheaper option, by $43 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between CANC and RWLC?
17.3% of CANC's money is in holdings RWLC also owns. 5.9% of RWLC's is in holdings CANC also owns. They hold 5 positions in common, counted across the 59 positions we hold weights for in CANC and 101 in RWLC.
Which pays a higher dividend, CANC or RWLC?
CANC yields 0.05% while RWLC yields 12.70%, so RWLC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RWLC better than CANC?
RWLC has a lower expense ratio. CANC led over 1Y. RWLC is less concentrated, with 37.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.