CANC vs ZJAN
Tema Oncology ETF vs Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr January
Which is better, CANC or ZJAN?
CANC has been ahead.
CANC has a lower expense ratio. CANC led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CANC | ZJAN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75%Best | 0.79% |
| AUM | $197M | $109M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.05% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 118 | 15 |
| YTD Return | +14.86%Best | +3.98% |
| 1Y Return | +34.85%Best | +5.91% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.41% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.4% | 2.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -19.7% | -3.2%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $16,355Best | $11,130 |
| Fund Family | Tema Global Limited | Innovator ETFs Trust |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 15, 2023 | Jan 2, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 2, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.8 years).
CANC vs ZJAN growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
CANC vs ZJAN Performance
Tema Oncology ETF (CANC) is an ETF from Tema Global Limited and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr January (ZJAN) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year CANC returned +34.85% while ZJAN returned +5.91%. Year to date, CANC is up 14.86% versus a gain of 3.98% for ZJAN.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CANC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.4% compared with 2.4% for ZJAN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.7% for CANC and -3.2% for ZJAN. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.28. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CANC charges 0.75% per year while ZJAN charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $79 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CANC currently yields 0.05% against 0.00% for ZJAN.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CANC and ZJAN you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CANC or ZJAN?
CANC has an expense ratio of 0.75% while ZJAN charges 0.79%. CANC is the cheaper option, by $4 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CANC or ZJAN?
Over the past year CANC returned +34.85% vs +5.91% for ZJAN, so CANC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CANC annualized +31.43% vs +6.13% for ZJAN. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CANC or ZJAN?
CANC has been the more volatile fund at 18.4% annualized versus 2.4% for ZJAN. Worst drawdown: CANC -19.7% vs ZJAN -3.2%.
Should I hold both CANC and ZJAN?
CANC and ZJAN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.28, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, CANC or ZJAN?
CANC yields 0.05% while ZJAN yields 0.00%, so CANC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ZJAN better than CANC?
CANC has a lower expense ratio. CANC led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.