CAOS vs WGMI
Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF vs CoinShares Bitcoin Mining and Digital Power ETF
Which is better, CAOS or WGMI?
Each has led over a different period.
CAOS has a lower expense ratio. CAOS led over 1Y, WGMI over 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CAOS | WGMI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.63%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $705M | $194M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 12 | 57 |
| YTD Return | +1.68%Best | -19.60% |
| 1Y Return | +1.45%Best | -47.00% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.57% | +55.28%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 2.0%Best | 81.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -3.6%Best | -62.8% |
| $10,000 over 3.6 years | $11,847 | $45,545Best |
| Fund Family | Alpha Architect | Valkyrie Funds |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Aug 14, 2013 | Feb 7, 2022 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 6, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.6 years).
CAOS vs WGMI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
CAOS vs WGMI Performance
Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS) is an ETF from Alpha Architect and CoinShares Bitcoin Mining and Digital Power ETF (WGMI) is an ETF from Valkyrie Funds. Over the past year CAOS returned +1.45% while WGMI returned -47.00%. Year to date, CAOS is up 1.68% versus a loss of 19.60% for WGMI.
Over three years, CAOS compounded at +3.57% per year against +55.28% for WGMI. Across the full 4-year window we track, WGMI has the edge at +52.37% annualized vs +4.82%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
WGMI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 81.5% compared with 2.0% for CAOS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -3.6% for CAOS and -62.8% for WGMI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.25. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CAOS charges 0.63% per year while WGMI charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $63 vs $75 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CAOS currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for WGMI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in CAOS and 28 in WGMI, totalling 0.1% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in CAOS and 28 in WGMI, against full books of 12 and 57.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CAOS and WGMI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CAOS or WGMI?
CAOS has an expense ratio of 0.63% while WGMI charges 0.75%. CAOS is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CAOS or WGMI?
Over the past year CAOS returned +1.45% vs -47.00% for WGMI, so CAOS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), CAOS annualized +4.82% vs +52.37% for WGMI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CAOS or WGMI?
WGMI has been the more volatile fund at 81.5% annualized versus 2.0% for CAOS. Worst drawdown: CAOS -3.6% vs WGMI -62.8%.
Should I hold both CAOS and WGMI?
CAOS and WGMI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.25, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, CAOS or WGMI?
CAOS yields 0.00% while WGMI yields 0.00%, so WGMI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WGMI better than CAOS?
CAOS has a lower expense ratio. CAOS led over 1Y, WGMI over 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.