CAOS vs XBJL
Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF vs Innovator US Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July
Which is better, CAOS or XBJL?
XBJL has been ahead.
CAOS has a lower expense ratio. XBJL led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CAOS | XBJL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.63%Best | 0.79% |
| AUM | $705M | $78M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 12 | 27 |
| YTD Return | +1.68% | +8.04%Best |
| 1Y Return | +1.38% | +10.65%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.56% | +12.76%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.48% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 2.0%Best | 5.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -3.6%Best | -11.7% |
| $10,000 over 3.6 years | $11,847 | $15,296Best |
| Fund Family | Alpha Architect | Innovator ETFs Trust |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Aug 14, 2013 | Jun 30, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 6, 2023 to Oct 15, 2026 (3.6 years).
CAOS vs XBJL growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.6 years both funds cover.
CAOS vs XBJL Performance
Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS) is an ETF from Alpha Architect and Innovator US Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July (XBJL) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year CAOS returned +1.38% while XBJL returned +10.65%. Year to date, CAOS is up 1.68% versus a gain of 8.04% for XBJL.
Over three years, CAOS compounded at +3.56% per year against +12.76% for XBJL. Across the full 4-year window we track, XBJL has the edge at +12.53% annualized vs +4.82%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XBJL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 5.5% compared with 2.0% for CAOS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -3.6% for CAOS and -11.7% for XBJL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.28. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CAOS charges 0.63% per year while XBJL charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $63 vs $79 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CAOS currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for XBJL.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in CAOS and 1 in XBJL, totalling 0.1% and 98.5% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in CAOS and 1 in XBJL, against full books of 12 and 27.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CAOS and XBJL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CAOS or XBJL?
CAOS has an expense ratio of 0.63% while XBJL charges 0.79%. CAOS is the cheaper option, by $16 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CAOS or XBJL?
Over the past year CAOS returned +1.38% vs +10.65% for XBJL, so XBJL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), CAOS annualized +4.82% vs +12.53% for XBJL. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CAOS or XBJL?
XBJL has been the more volatile fund at 5.5% annualized versus 2.0% for CAOS. Worst drawdown: CAOS -3.6% vs XBJL -11.7%.
Should I hold both CAOS and XBJL?
CAOS and XBJL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.28, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, CAOS or XBJL?
CAOS yields 0.00% while XBJL yields 0.00%, so XBJL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XBJL better than CAOS?
CAOS has a lower expense ratio. XBJL led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.