CARK vs FBCG
CastleArk Large Growth ETF vs Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
Which is better, CARK or FBCG?
Nearly the same fund. CARK costs less.
CARK has a lower expense ratio. FBCG led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. FBCG is less concentrated, with 57.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CARK | FBCG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.54%Best | 0.57% |
| AUM | $351M | $7.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.01% | 0.03% |
| Holdings | 60 | 245 |
| YTD Return | +9.30% | +12.59%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.27% | +17.09%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +27.54% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.04% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.5%Best | 18.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -25.2%Best | -27.9% |
| $10,000 over 2.9 years | $16,010 | $19,664Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 63.4% | 57.5%Best |
| Fund Family | CastleArk Management LLC | Fidelity Investments (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Dec 6, 2023 | Jun 2, 2020 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 7, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.9 years).
CARK vs FBCG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.9 years both funds cover.
CARK vs FBCG Performance
CastleArk Large Growth ETF (CARK) is an ETF from CastleArk Management LLC and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US). Over the past year CARK returned +11.27% while FBCG returned +17.09%. Year to date, CARK is up 9.30% versus a gain of 12.59% for FBCG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FBCG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.8% compared with 16.5% for CARK. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.2% for CARK and -27.9% for FBCG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CARK charges 0.54% per year while FBCG charges 0.57%. On a $10,000 position that is $54 vs $57 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CARK currently yields 0.01% against 0.03% for FBCG.
Holdings Overlap
92.3% of CARK's money is in holdings FBCG also owns. 59.2% of FBCG's money is in holdings CARK also owns.
Most of CARK is already inside FBCG. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
24 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in CARK and 200 in FBCG, against full books of 60 and 245.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 158 positions for FBCG that do not appear in our book for CARK (37.1% of the fund), and 5 for CARK that do not appear in FBCG (7.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CARK | Weight in FBCG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 14.36% | 15.68% | 1.32% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 9.33% | 8.64% | 0.69% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.30% | 9.22% | 2.92% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.68% | 5.56% | 0.88% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.24% | 4.11% | 0.13% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 5.21% | 2.65% | 2.56% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.23% | 4.97% | 2.74% |
| LRCXLrcx Uw Equity | 5.43% | 0.52% | 4.91% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.48% | 2.42% | 1.06% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 4.17% | 1.26% | 2.91% |
92.3% of CARK is already inside FBCG.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CARK or FBCG?
CARK has an expense ratio of 0.54% while FBCG charges 0.57%. CARK is the cheaper option, by $3 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CARK or FBCG?
Over the past year CARK returned +11.27% vs +17.09% for FBCG, so FBCG leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CARK or FBCG?
FBCG has been the more volatile fund at 18.8% annualized versus 16.5% for CARK. Worst drawdown: CARK -25.2% vs FBCG -27.9%.
Should I hold both CARK and FBCG?
CARK and FBCG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CARK and FBCG?
92.3% of CARK's money is in holdings FBCG also owns. 59.2% of FBCG's is in holdings CARK also owns. They hold 24 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in CARK and 200 in FBCG.
Which pays a higher dividend, CARK or FBCG?
CARK yields 0.01% while FBCG yields 0.03%, so FBCG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FBCG better than CARK?
CARK has a lower expense ratio. FBCG led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. FBCG is less concentrated, with 57.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.