CARK vs FELG
CastleArk Large Growth ETF vs Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF
Which is better, CARK or FELG?
Nearly the same fund. FELG costs less.
FELG has a lower expense ratio. CARK led over 1Y, FELG over the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. FELG is less concentrated, with 58.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CARK | FELG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.54% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $351M | $5.8B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.01% | 0.35% |
| Holdings | 60 | 135 |
| YTD Return | +9.30%Best | +7.63% |
| 1Y Return | +11.27%Best | +10.39% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.35% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.5% | 15.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -25.2% | -23.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.9 years | $16,010 | $17,992Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 63.4% | 58.3%Best |
| Fund Family | CastleArk Management LLC | Fidelity Investments (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Dec 6, 2023 | Nov 20, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 7, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.9 years).
CARK vs FELG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.9 years both funds cover.
CARK vs FELG Performance
CastleArk Large Growth ETF (CARK) is an ETF from CastleArk Management LLC and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US). Over the past year CARK returned +11.27% while FELG returned +10.39%. Year to date, CARK is up 9.30% versus a gain of 7.63% for FELG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CARK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.5% compared with 15.8% for FELG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.2% for CARK and -23.9% for FELG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CARK charges 0.54% per year while FELG charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $54 vs $18 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CARK currently yields 0.01% against 0.35% for FELG.
Holdings Overlap
90.4% of CARK's money is in holdings FELG also owns. 61.5% of FELG's money is in holdings CARK also owns.
Most of CARK is already inside FELG. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
22 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in CARK and 127 in FELG, against full books of 60 and 135.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 89 positions for FELG that do not appear in our book for CARK (38.2% of the fund), and 6 for CARK that do not appear in FELG (8.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CARK | Weight in FELG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 14.36% | 16.24% | 1.88% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 9.33% | 7.46% | 1.87% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.30% | 8.01% | 1.71% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.68% | 5.00% | 0.32% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.24% | 5.05% | 0.81% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 5.21% | 3.11% | 2.10% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.48% | 3.81% | 0.33% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 4.17% | 2.42% | 1.75% |
| LRCXLrcx Uw Equity | 5.43% | 0.83% | 4.60% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 4.45% | 1.27% | 3.18% |
90.4% of CARK is already inside FELG.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CARK or FELG?
CARK has an expense ratio of 0.54% while FELG charges 0.18%. FELG is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CARK or FELG?
Over the past year CARK returned +11.27% vs +10.39% for FELG, so CARK leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CARK or FELG?
CARK has been the more volatile fund at 16.5% annualized versus 15.8% for FELG. Worst drawdown: CARK -25.2% vs FELG -23.9%.
Should I hold both CARK and FELG?
CARK and FELG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CARK and FELG?
90.4% of CARK's money is in holdings FELG also owns. 61.5% of FELG's is in holdings CARK also owns. They hold 22 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in CARK and 127 in FELG.
Which pays a higher dividend, CARK or FELG?
CARK yields 0.01% while FELG yields 0.35%, so FELG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FELG better than CARK?
FELG has a lower expense ratio. CARK led over 1Y, FELG over the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. FELG is less concentrated, with 58.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.