CARK vs FFOG
CastleArk Large Growth ETF vs Franklin Focused Dynamic Growth ETF
Which is better, CARK or FFOG?
Nearly the same fund. FFOG costs less.
FFOG has a lower expense ratio. CARK led over 1Y, FFOG over the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. FFOG is less concentrated, with 55.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CARK | FFOG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.54% | 0.41%Best |
| AUM | $351M | $386M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.01% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 60 | 43 |
| YTD Return | +9.30%Best | +8.34% |
| 1Y Return | +11.27%Best | +7.46% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.71% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.5%Best | 20.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -25.2%Best | -25.4% |
| $10,000 over 2.9 years | $16,010 | $18,512Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 63.4% | 55.5%Best |
| Fund Family | CastleArk Management LLC | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Dec 6, 2023 | Nov 6, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 7, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.9 years).
CARK vs FFOG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.9 years both funds cover.
CARK vs FFOG Performance
CastleArk Large Growth ETF (CARK) is an ETF from CastleArk Management LLC and Franklin Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FFOG) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US). Over the past year CARK returned +11.27% while FFOG returned +7.46%. Year to date, CARK is up 9.30% versus a gain of 8.34% for FFOG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FFOG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.3% compared with 16.5% for CARK. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.2% for CARK and -25.4% for FFOG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CARK charges 0.54% per year while FFOG charges 0.41%. On a $10,000 position that is $54 vs $41 annually, a gap of $13 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CARK currently yields 0.01% against 0.00% for FFOG.
Holdings Overlap
74.7% of CARK's money is in holdings FFOG also owns. 59.2% of FFOG's money is in holdings CARK also owns.
Most of CARK is already inside FFOG. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
15 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in CARK and 41 in FFOG, against full books of 60 and 43.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 18 positions for FFOG that do not appear in our book for CARK (26.2% of the fund), and 14 for CARK that do not appear in FFOG (24.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CARK | Weight in FFOG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 14.36% | 10.05% | 4.31% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 9.33% | 7.96% | 1.37% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.30% | 5.50% | 0.80% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.23% | 8.49% | 6.26% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.68% | 3.90% | 0.78% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.48% | 4.98% | 1.50% |
| LRCXLrcx Uw Equity | 5.43% | 2.45% | 2.98% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.24% | 3.45% | 0.79% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 5.21% | 2.01% | 3.20% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 4.17% | 2.79% | 1.38% |
74.7% of CARK is already inside FFOG.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CARK or FFOG?
CARK has an expense ratio of 0.54% while FFOG charges 0.41%. FFOG is the cheaper option, by $13 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CARK or FFOG?
Over the past year CARK returned +11.27% vs +7.46% for FFOG, so CARK leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CARK or FFOG?
FFOG has been the more volatile fund at 20.3% annualized versus 16.5% for CARK. Worst drawdown: CARK -25.2% vs FFOG -25.4%.
Should I hold both CARK and FFOG?
CARK and FFOG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CARK and FFOG?
74.7% of CARK's money is in holdings FFOG also owns. 59.2% of FFOG's is in holdings CARK also owns. They hold 15 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in CARK and 41 in FFOG.
Which pays a higher dividend, CARK or FFOG?
CARK yields 0.01% while FFOG yields 0.00%, so CARK currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FFOG better than CARK?
FFOG has a lower expense ratio. CARK led over 1Y, FFOG over the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. FFOG is less concentrated, with 55.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.