CARK vs LRGG
CastleArk Large Growth ETF vs Nomura Focused Large Growth ETF
Which is better, CARK or LRGG?
CARK has been ahead.
LRGG has a lower expense ratio. CARK led over 1Y and the full window. CARK is less concentrated, with 63.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 71.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CARK | LRGG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.54% | 0.44%Best |
| AUM | $351M | $295M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.01% | 0.15% |
| Holdings | 60 | 44 |
| YTD Return | +9.30%Best | +3.29% |
| 1Y Return | +11.27%Best | +3.58% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.4% | 12.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -25.2% | -18.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.4 years | $13,137Best | $11,970 |
| Top 10 Weight | 63.4%Best | 71.4% |
| Fund Family | CastleArk Management LLC | Nomura Asset Management Co Ltd |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Dec 6, 2023 | May 14, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 15, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.4 years).
CARK vs LRGG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.4 years both funds cover.
CARK vs LRGG Performance
CastleArk Large Growth ETF (CARK) is an ETF from CastleArk Management LLC and Nomura Focused Large Growth ETF (LRGG) is an ETF from Nomura Asset Management Co Ltd. Over the past year CARK returned +11.27% while LRGG returned +3.58%. Year to date, CARK is up 9.30% versus a gain of 3.29% for LRGG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CARK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.4% compared with 12.4% for LRGG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.2% for CARK and -18.9% for LRGG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CARK charges 0.54% per year while LRGG charges 0.44%. On a $10,000 position that is $54 vs $44 annually, a gap of $10 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CARK currently yields 0.01% against 0.15% for LRGG.
Holdings Overlap
34.6% of CARK's money is in holdings LRGG also owns. 43.6% of LRGG's money is in holdings CARK also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
6 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in CARK and 21 in LRGG, against full books of 60 and 44.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 12 positions for LRGG that do not appear in our book for CARK (45.5% of the fund), and 22 for CARK that do not appear in LRGG (64.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
43.6% of LRGG is already inside CARK.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CARK or LRGG?
CARK has an expense ratio of 0.54% while LRGG charges 0.44%. LRGG is the cheaper option, by $10 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CARK or LRGG?
Over the past year CARK returned +11.27% vs +3.58% for LRGG, so CARK leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CARK annualized +12.04% vs +7.78% for LRGG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CARK or LRGG?
CARK has been the more volatile fund at 16.4% annualized versus 12.4% for LRGG. Worst drawdown: CARK -25.2% vs LRGG -18.9%.
Should I hold both CARK and LRGG?
CARK and LRGG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CARK and LRGG?
43.6% of LRGG's money is in holdings CARK also owns. 43.6% of LRGG's is in holdings CARK also owns. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in CARK and 21 in LRGG.
Which pays a higher dividend, CARK or LRGG?
CARK yields 0.01% while LRGG yields 0.15%, so LRGG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is LRGG better than CARK?
LRGG has a lower expense ratio. CARK led over 1Y and the full window. CARK is less concentrated, with 63.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 71.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.