CARK vs TFGZ
CastleArk Large Growth ETF vs Thornburg Focus Growth Fund ETF
Which is better, CARK or TFGZ?
TFGZ has been ahead.
CARK has a lower expense ratio. TFGZ led over 1Y. TFGZ is less concentrated, with 49.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CARK | TFGZ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.54%Best | 0.79% |
| AUM | $351M | $12M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.01% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 60 | 43 |
| YTD Return | +9.30% | +16.33%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.27% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 63.4% | 49.4%Best |
| Fund Family | CastleArk Management LLC | Thornburg Investment Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Dec 6, 2023 | Apr 1, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
CARK vs TFGZ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
CARK vs TFGZ Performance
CastleArk Large Growth ETF (CARK) is an ETF from CastleArk Management LLC and Thornburg Focus Growth Fund ETF (TFGZ) is an ETF from Thornburg Investment Management. Year to date, CARK is up 9.30% versus a gain of 16.33% for TFGZ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CARK charges 0.54% per year while TFGZ charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $54 vs $79 annually, a gap of $25 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CARK currently yields 0.01% against 0.00% for TFGZ.
Holdings Overlap
33.5% of CARK's money is in holdings TFGZ also owns. 41.4% of TFGZ's money is in holdings CARK also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
9 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in CARK and 42 in TFGZ, against full books of 60 and 43.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 26 positions for TFGZ that do not appear in our book for CARK (45.0% of the fund), and 20 for CARK that do not appear in TFGZ (65.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CARK | Weight in TFGZ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 9.33% | 12.16% | 2.83% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.68% | 7.18% | 2.50% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.24% | 6.00% | 1.76% |
| LRCXLrcx Uw Equity | 5.43% | 3.30% | 2.13% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.48% | 3.77% | 0.29% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 2.54% | 3.34% | 0.80% |
| VRTVertiv Holdings Co | 2.13% | 2.62% | 0.49% |
| TPRTapestry Inc. | 0.99% | 1.59% | 0.60% |
| SHOP:CAShopify Inc | 0.67% | 1.43% | 0.76% |
41.4% of TFGZ is already inside CARK.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CARK or TFGZ?
CARK has an expense ratio of 0.54% while TFGZ charges 0.79%. CARK is the cheaper option, by $25 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between CARK and TFGZ?
41.4% of TFGZ's money is in holdings CARK also owns. 41.4% of TFGZ's is in holdings CARK also owns. They hold 9 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in CARK and 42 in TFGZ.
Which pays a higher dividend, CARK or TFGZ?
CARK yields 0.01% while TFGZ yields 0.00%, so CARK currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TFGZ better than CARK?
CARK has a lower expense ratio. TFGZ led over 1Y. TFGZ is less concentrated, with 49.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.