CARK vs WINN
CastleArk Large Growth ETF vs Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF
Which is better, CARK or WINN?
Nearly the same fund. CARK costs less.
CARK has a lower expense ratio. WINN led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. WINN is less concentrated, with 57.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CARK | WINN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.54%Best | 0.57% |
| AUM | $351M | $1.3B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.01% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 60 | 146 |
| YTD Return | +9.30% | +11.03%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.27% | +11.42%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.98% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.5%Tie | 16.5%Tie |
| Max Drawdown | -25.2% | -23.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.9 years | $16,010 | $17,490Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 63.4% | 57.5%Best |
| Fund Family | CastleArk Management LLC | Harbor Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Dec 6, 2023 | Feb 2, 2022 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 7, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.9 years).
CARK vs WINN growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.9 years both funds cover.
CARK vs WINN Performance
CastleArk Large Growth ETF (CARK) is an ETF from CastleArk Management LLC and Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN) is an ETF from Harbor Funds. Over the past year CARK returned +11.27% while WINN returned +11.42%. Year to date, CARK is up 9.30% versus a gain of 11.03% for WINN.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CARK and WINN have been equally volatile, both at 16.5% annualized.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.2% for CARK and -23.7% for WINN. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CARK charges 0.54% per year while WINN charges 0.57%. On a $10,000 position that is $54 vs $57 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CARK currently yields 0.01% against 0.00% for WINN.
Holdings Overlap
88.7% of CARK's money is in holdings WINN also owns. 66.2% of WINN's money is in holdings CARK also owns.
Most of CARK is already inside WINN. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
23 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in CARK and 74 in WINN, against full books of 60 and 146.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 47 positions for WINN that do not appear in our book for CARK (32.3% of the fund), and 6 for CARK that do not appear in WINN (10.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CARK | Weight in WINN | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 14.36% | 11.75% | 2.61% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 9.33% | 8.02% | 1.31% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.30% | 7.51% | 1.21% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.68% | 6.21% | 1.53% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.24% | 5.40% | 1.16% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 5.21% | 3.61% | 1.60% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 4.17% | 3.64% | 0.53% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.48% | 3.89% | 0.41% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.23% | 4.82% | 2.59% |
| ANETArista Networks Inc Common Stock | 5.25% | 1.07% | 4.18% |
88.7% of CARK is already inside WINN.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CARK or WINN?
CARK has an expense ratio of 0.54% while WINN charges 0.57%. CARK is the cheaper option, by $3 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CARK or WINN?
Over the past year CARK returned +11.27% vs +11.42% for WINN, so WINN leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CARK or WINN?
CARK and WINN have been equally volatile, both at 16.5% annualized. Worst drawdown: CARK -25.2% vs WINN -23.7%.
Should I hold both CARK and WINN?
CARK and WINN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CARK and WINN?
88.7% of CARK's money is in holdings WINN also owns. 66.2% of WINN's is in holdings CARK also owns. They hold 23 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in CARK and 74 in WINN.
Which pays a higher dividend, CARK or WINN?
CARK yields 0.01% while WINN yields 0.00%, so CARK currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WINN better than CARK?
CARK has a lower expense ratio. WINN led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. WINN is less concentrated, with 57.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.