CBTJ vs CBXA
Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January vs Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April
Which is better, CBTJ or CBXA?
CBXA has been ahead.
CBXA led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CBTJ | CBXA |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.69%Tie | 0.69%Tie |
| AUM | $26M | $5M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.53% | 2.24% |
| Holdings | 7 | 7 |
| YTD Return | -9.27%Best | -13.44% |
| 1Y Return | -26.97% | -18.27%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.8% | 17.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -42.4% | -29.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.5 years | $9,044 | $9,635Best |
| Fund Family | Calamos Investments | Calamos Investments |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Option Writing | Option Writing |
| Inception | Feb 4, 2025 | Apr 7, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 7, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.5 years).
CBTJ vs CBXA growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.5 years both funds cover.
CBTJ vs CBXA Performance
Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBTJ) is an ETF from Calamos Investments and Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CBXA) is an ETF from Calamos Investments. Over the past year CBTJ returned -26.97% while CBXA returned -18.27%. Year to date, CBTJ is down 9.27% versus a loss of 13.44% for CBXA.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CBTJ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.8% compared with 17.6% for CBXA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.4% for CBTJ and -29.7% for CBXA. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CBTJ charges 0.69% per year while CBXA charges 0.69%. On a $10,000 position that is $69 vs $69 annually. On income, CBTJ currently yields 1.53% against 2.24% for CBXA.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CBTJ and CBXA you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CBTJ or CBXA?
CBTJ has an expense ratio of 0.69% while CBXA charges 0.69%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, CBTJ or CBXA?
Over the past year CBTJ returned -26.97% vs -18.27% for CBXA, so CBXA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CBTJ annualized -6.48% vs -2.45% for CBXA. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CBTJ or CBXA?
CBTJ has been the more volatile fund at 24.8% annualized versus 17.6% for CBXA. Worst drawdown: CBTJ -42.4% vs CBXA -29.7%.
Should I hold both CBTJ and CBXA?
CBTJ and CBXA have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, CBTJ or CBXA?
CBTJ yields 1.53% while CBXA yields 2.24%, so CBXA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is CBXA better than CBTJ?
CBXA led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.