CCOR vs GMAY
Core Alternative ETF vs FT Vest US Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - May
Which is better, CCOR or GMAY?
GMAY has been ahead.
GMAY has a lower expense ratio. GMAY led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CCOR | GMAY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.16% | 0.85%Best |
| AUM | $25M | $448M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 44 | 10 |
| YTD Return | -0.81% | +6.79%Best |
| 1Y Return | -0.54% | +9.14%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -1.12% | +12.19%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -1.81% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.2% | 6.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -12.3% | -11.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.4 years | $9,473 | $14,598Best |
| Fund Family | Core Alternative Capital | First Trust Portfolios (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | May 23, 2017 | May 19, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 22, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.4 years).
CCOR vs GMAY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.4 years both funds cover.
CCOR vs GMAY Performance
Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) is an ETF from Core Alternative Capital and FT Vest US Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - May (GMAY) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year CCOR returned -0.54% while GMAY returned +9.14%. Year to date, CCOR is down 0.81% versus a gain of 6.79% for GMAY.
Over three years, CCOR compounded at -1.12% per year against +12.19% for GMAY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CCOR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 8.2% compared with 6.0% for GMAY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.3% for CCOR and -11.8% for GMAY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.03. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CCOR charges 1.16% per year while GMAY charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $116 vs $85 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CCOR currently yields 1.00% against 0.00% for GMAY.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CCOR and GMAY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CCOR or GMAY?
CCOR has an expense ratio of 1.16% while GMAY charges 0.85%. GMAY is the cheaper option, by $31 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CCOR or GMAY?
Over the past year CCOR returned -0.54% vs +9.14% for GMAY, so GMAY leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CCOR or GMAY?
CCOR has been the more volatile fund at 8.2% annualized versus 6.0% for GMAY. Worst drawdown: CCOR -12.3% vs GMAY -11.8%.
Should I hold both CCOR and GMAY?
CCOR and GMAY have a monthly-return correlation of -0.03, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, CCOR or GMAY?
CCOR yields 1.00% while GMAY yields 0.00%, so CCOR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is GMAY better than CCOR?
GMAY has a lower expense ratio. GMAY led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.