CCOR vs METU
Core Alternative ETF vs Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF
Which is better, CCOR or METU?
Each has led over a different period.
METU has a lower expense ratio. CCOR led over 1Y, METU over the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CCOR | METU |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.16% | 1.02%Best |
| AUM | $25M | $506M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.00% | 2.70% |
| Holdings | 44 | 20 |
| YTD Return | -0.18% | +2.47%Best |
| 1Y Return | -0.10%Best | -19.97% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -0.91% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -1.78% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.6%Best | 70.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -9.8%Best | -63.9% |
| $10,000 over 2.4 years | $10,450 | $12,420Best |
| Fund Family | Core Alternative Capital | Direxion Shares ETF Trust |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | May 23, 2017 | Jun 5, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 5, 2024 to Oct 15, 2026 (2.4 years).
CCOR vs METU growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
CCOR vs METU Performance
Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) is an ETF from Core Alternative Capital and Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust. Over the past year CCOR returned -0.10% while METU returned -19.97%. Year to date, CCOR is down 0.18% versus a gain of 2.47% for METU.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
METU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 70.0% compared with 9.6% for CCOR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.8% for CCOR and -63.9% for METU. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.18. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CCOR charges 1.16% per year while METU charges 1.02%. On a $10,000 position that is $116 vs $102 annually, a gap of $14 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CCOR currently yields 1.00% against 2.70% for METU.
Holdings Overlap
At least 2.6% of CCOR's money is in holdings METU also owns.
Stated as a floor: for METU, our book for it covers 87.8% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
CCOR and METU share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 37 positions we hold weights for in CCOR and 4 in METU, against full books of 44 and 20.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CCOR | Weight in METU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.63% | 17.27% | 14.64% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CCOR and METU you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CCOR or METU?
CCOR has an expense ratio of 1.16% while METU charges 1.02%. METU is the cheaper option, by $14 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CCOR or METU?
Over the past year CCOR returned -0.10% vs -19.97% for METU, so CCOR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CCOR annualized +1.85% vs +9.45% for METU. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CCOR or METU?
METU has been the more volatile fund at 70.0% annualized versus 9.6% for CCOR. Worst drawdown: CCOR -9.8% vs METU -63.9%.
Should I hold both CCOR and METU?
CCOR and METU have a monthly-return correlation of -0.18, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CCOR and METU?
At least 2.6% of CCOR's money is in holdings METU also owns. Our book for METU is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 37 positions we hold weights for in CCOR and 4 in METU.
Which pays a higher dividend, CCOR or METU?
CCOR yields 1.00% while METU yields 2.70%, so METU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is METU better than CCOR?
METU has a lower expense ratio. CCOR led over 1Y, METU over the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.