CCOR vs SSO
Core Alternative ETF vs ProShares Ultra S&P500
Which is better, CCOR or SSO?
SSO has been ahead.
SSO has a lower expense ratio. SSO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CCOR | SSO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.16% | 0.84%Best |
| AUM | $25M | $9.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.00% | 0.69% |
| Holdings | 44 | 521 |
| YTD Return | -0.81% | +21.98%Best |
| 1Y Return | -0.54% | +28.56%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -1.12% | +37.60%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -1.81% | +17.88%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.8%Best | 32.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -23.0%Best | -59.3% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $9,127 | $22,761Best |
| Fund Family | Core Alternative Capital | ProShares |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | May 23, 2017 | Jun 19, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 24, 2017 to Oct 14, 2026 (9.4 years).
CCOR vs SSO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
CCOR vs SSO Performance
Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) is an ETF from Core Alternative Capital and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) is an ETF from ProShares. Over the past year CCOR returned -0.54% while SSO returned +28.56%. Year to date, CCOR is down 0.81% versus a gain of 21.98% for SSO.
Over three years, CCOR compounded at -1.12% per year against +37.60% for SSO; over five years the annualized figures are -1.81% and +17.88% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, SSO has the edge at +22.24% annualized vs +0.98%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SSO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 32.1% compared with 7.8% for CCOR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.0% for CCOR and -59.3% for SSO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.13. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CCOR charges 1.16% per year while SSO charges 0.84%. On a $10,000 position that is $116 vs $84 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CCOR currently yields 1.00% against 0.69% for SSO.
Holdings Overlap
At least 98.7% of CCOR's money is in holdings SSO also owns.
Stated as a floor: for SSO, our book for it covers 82.2% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of CCOR is already inside SSO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
34 positions in common, counted across the 37 positions we hold weights for in CCOR and 504 in SSO, against full books of 44 and 521.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CCOR | Weight in SSO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.23% | 3.89% | 0.34% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 3.13% | 4.93% | 1.80% |
| GOOGLAlphabet, Inc. - Class a | 5.35% | 2.04% | 3.31% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.97% | 2.50% | 0.47% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson | 4.85% | 0.62% | 4.23% |
| XOMExxonmobil Corp. | 4.10% | 0.68% | 3.42% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase & Co | 3.81% | 0.89% | 2.92% |
| MSMorgan Stanley | 4.07% | 0.23% | 3.84% |
| METAMeta Platforms, Inc. | 2.63% | 1.62% | 1.01% |
| CVXChevron Corp. | 3.42% | 0.41% | 3.01% |
98.7% of CCOR is already inside SSO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CCOR or SSO?
CCOR has an expense ratio of 1.16% while SSO charges 0.84%. SSO is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CCOR or SSO?
Over the past year CCOR returned -0.54% vs +28.56% for SSO, so SSO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), CCOR annualized +0.98% vs +22.24% for SSO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CCOR or SSO?
SSO has been the more volatile fund at 32.1% annualized versus 7.8% for CCOR. Worst drawdown: CCOR -23.0% vs SSO -59.3%.
Should I hold both CCOR and SSO?
CCOR and SSO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.13, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CCOR and SSO?
At least 98.7% of CCOR's money is in holdings SSO also owns. Our book for SSO is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 34 positions in common, counted across the 37 positions we hold weights for in CCOR and 504 in SSO.
Which pays a higher dividend, CCOR or SSO?
CCOR yields 1.00% while SSO yields 0.69%, so CCOR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SSO better than CCOR?
SSO has a lower expense ratio. SSO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.