CCSO vs HRTS
Carbon Collective Climate Solutions US Equity ETF vs Tema Heart & Health ETF
Which is better, CCSO or HRTS?
HRTS has been ahead.
CCSO has a lower expense ratio. HRTS led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. HRTS is less concentrated, with 48.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CCSO | HRTS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $45M | $53M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.64% | 1.30% |
| Holdings | 124 | 92 |
| YTD Return | -3.16% | +2.75%Best |
| 1Y Return | -5.92% | +14.59%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.97% | +13.00%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.8% | 17.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -22.8%Best | -24.7% |
| $10,000 over 2.9 years | $13,996 | $14,254Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 49.7% | 48.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Carbon Collective Funds | Tema Global Limited |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 19, 2022 | Nov 20, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 21, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.9 years).
CCSO vs HRTS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.9 years both funds cover.
CCSO vs HRTS Performance
Carbon Collective Climate Solutions US Equity ETF (CCSO) is an ETF from Carbon Collective Funds and Tema Heart & Health ETF (HRTS) is an ETF from Tema Global Limited. Over the past year CCSO returned -5.92% while HRTS returned +14.59%. Year to date, CCSO is down 3.16% versus a gain of 2.75% for HRTS.
Over three years, CCSO compounded at +11.97% per year against +13.00% for HRTS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CCSO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.8% compared with 17.1% for HRTS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.8% for CCSO and -24.7% for HRTS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.26. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CCSO charges 0.35% per year while HRTS charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $75 annually, a gap of $40 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CCSO currently yields 0.64% against 1.30% for HRTS.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 123 holdings in CCSO and 46 in HRTS, totalling 100.0% and 100.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 123 positions we hold weights for in CCSO and 46 in HRTS, against full books of 124 and 92.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 38 positions for HRTS that do not appear in our book for CCSO (82.8% of the fund), and 92 for CCSO that do not appear in HRTS (85.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CCSO and HRTS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CCSO or HRTS?
CCSO has an expense ratio of 0.35% while HRTS charges 0.75%. CCSO is the cheaper option, by $40 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CCSO or HRTS?
Over the past year CCSO returned -5.92% vs +14.59% for HRTS, so HRTS leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CCSO or HRTS?
CCSO has been the more volatile fund at 19.8% annualized versus 17.1% for HRTS. Worst drawdown: CCSO -22.8% vs HRTS -24.7%.
Should I hold both CCSO and HRTS?
CCSO and HRTS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.26, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, CCSO or HRTS?
CCSO yields 0.64% while HRTS yields 1.30%, so HRTS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is HRTS better than CCSO?
CCSO has a lower expense ratio. HRTS led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. HRTS is less concentrated, with 48.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.