CCSO vs OVLH

CCSO vs OVLH

Which is better, CCSO or OVLH?

OVLH has been ahead.

CCSO has a lower expense ratio. OVLH led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: CCSOHigher Returns: OVLH

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCCSOOVLH
Expense Ratio0.35%Best0.80%
AUM$45M$107M
Dividend Yield0.64%0.28%
Holdings12418
YTD Return-3.16%+6.99%Best
1Y Return-5.92%+8.65%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+11.97%+15.98%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-+8.81%
Volatility (annualized)22.0%10.1%Best
Max Drawdown-23.7%-9.6%Best
$10,000 over 4.1 years$12,787$17,217Best
Fund FamilyCarbon Collective FundsOverlay Shares
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionSep 19, 2022Jan 14, 2021

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 20, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.1 years).

CCSO vs OVLH growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.1 years both funds cover.

Compare CCSO against instead:CCSO vs SPYCCSO vs QQQCCSO vs VOOCCSO vs VTIOVLH against:OVLH vs VXUS

CCSO vs OVLH Performance

Carbon Collective Climate Solutions US Equity ETF (CCSO) is an ETF from Carbon Collective Funds and Overlay Shares Hedged Large Cap Equity ETF (OVLH) is an ETF from Overlay Shares. Over the past year CCSO returned -5.92% while OVLH returned +8.65%. Year to date, CCSO is down 3.16% versus a gain of 6.99% for OVLH.

Over three years, CCSO compounded at +11.97% per year against +15.98% for OVLH. Across the full 4-year window we track, OVLH has the edge at +14.17% annualized vs +6.18%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

CCSO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.0% compared with 10.1% for OVLH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.7% for CCSO and -9.6% for OVLH. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

CCSO charges 0.35% per year while OVLH charges 0.80%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $80 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CCSO currently yields 0.64% against 0.28% for OVLH.

Holdings Overlap

CCSO already in OVLH1.6%

At least 1.6% of CCSO's money is in holdings OVLH also owns.

Stated as a floor: for OVLH, our book for it covers 98.1% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.

CCSO and OVLH share little of their money.

1 positions in common, counted across the 123 positions we hold weights for in CCSO and 2 in OVLH, against full books of 124 and 18.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in CCSOWeight in OVLHDifference
FGXXXFirst American Government Obligations Fund1.57%0.29%1.28%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of CCSO and OVLH you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

CCSOOVLH

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, CCSO or OVLH?

CCSO has an expense ratio of 0.35% while OVLH charges 0.80%. CCSO is the cheaper option, by $45 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, CCSO or OVLH?

Over the past year CCSO returned -5.92% vs +8.65% for OVLH, so OVLH leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), CCSO annualized +6.18% vs +14.17% for OVLH. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, CCSO or OVLH?

CCSO has been the more volatile fund at 22.0% annualized versus 10.1% for OVLH. Worst drawdown: CCSO -23.7% vs OVLH -9.6%.

Should I hold both CCSO and OVLH?

CCSO and OVLH have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between CCSO and OVLH?

At least 1.6% of CCSO's money is in holdings OVLH also owns. Our book for OVLH is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 123 positions we hold weights for in CCSO and 2 in OVLH.

Which pays a higher dividend, CCSO or OVLH?

CCSO yields 0.64% while OVLH yields 0.28%, so CCSO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is OVLH better than CCSO?

CCSO has a lower expense ratio. OVLH led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.