CGGG vs VTI
Capital Group US Large Growth ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, CGGG or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGGG | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $74M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.09% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 86 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | -0.54% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | +0.10% | +16.63%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.99% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.0% | 11.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -17.8% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $10,984 | $12,697Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 61.4% | 33.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Capital Group (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 24, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 26, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.3 years).
CGGG vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
CGGG vs VTI Performance
Capital Group US Large Growth ETF (CGGG) is an ETF from Capital Group (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CGGG returned +0.10% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, CGGG is down 0.54% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CGGG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.0% compared with 11.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.8% for CGGG and -8.9% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGGG charges 0.39% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGGG currently yields 0.09% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
96.8% of CGGG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 37.0% of VTI's money is in holdings CGGG also owns.
Most of CGGG is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
39 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in CGGG and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 86 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,118 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for CGGG (60.6% of the fund), and 2 for CGGG that do not appear in VTI (2.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CGGG | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 11.63% | 6.88% | 4.75% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 9.79% | 2.12% | 7.67% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.41% | 5.11% | 1.30% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 7.87% | 2.38% | 5.49% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 2.20% | 6.30% | 4.10% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 6.57% | 1.70% | 4.87% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 5.17% | 1.46% | 3.71% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 1.59% | 3.41% | 1.82% |
| APHAmphenol Corp. Class A | 4.38% | 0.26% | 4.12% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 3.53% | 0.63% | 2.90% |
96.8% of CGGG is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGGG or VTI?
CGGG has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CGGG or VTI?
Over the past year CGGG returned +0.10% vs +16.63% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), CGGG annualized +7.49% vs +20.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CGGG or VTI?
CGGG has been the more volatile fund at 16.0% annualized versus 11.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: CGGG -17.8% vs VTI -8.9%.
Should I hold both CGGG and VTI?
CGGG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CGGG and VTI?
96.8% of CGGG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 37.0% of VTI's is in holdings CGGG also owns. They hold 39 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in CGGG and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGGG or VTI?
CGGG yields 0.09% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than CGGG?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.