CGGR vs GK
Capital Group Growth ETF vs AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF
Which is better, CGGR or GK?
Nearly the same fund. CGGR costs less.
CGGR has a lower expense ratio. CGGR led over 3Y and the full window, GK over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. CGGR is less concentrated, with 40.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGGR | GK |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39%Best | 0.77% |
| AUM | $26.6B | $32M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.15% | 0.07% |
| Holdings | 97 | 60 |
| YTD Return | +6.35% | +10.81%Best |
| 1Y Return | +8.20% | +8.34%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.14%Best | +19.66% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +2.56% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.3%Best | 22.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -28.9%Best | -37.3% |
| $10,000 over 4.6 years | $19,434Best | $13,517 |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.8%Best | 62.7% |
| Fund Family | Capital Group (US) | Advisor Shares |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Feb 22, 2022 | Jul 1, 2021 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 24, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.6 years).
CGGR vs GK growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.6 years both funds cover.
CGGR vs GK Performance
Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR) is an ETF from Capital Group (US) and AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) is an ETF from Advisor Shares. Over the past year CGGR returned +8.20% while GK returned +8.34%. Year to date, CGGR is up 6.35% versus a gain of 10.81% for GK.
Over three years, CGGR compounded at +24.14% per year against +19.66% for GK.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.7% compared with 19.3% for CGGR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -28.9% for CGGR and -37.3% for GK. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGGR charges 0.39% per year while GK charges 0.77%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $77 annually, a gap of $38 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGGR currently yields 0.15% against 0.07% for GK.
Holdings Overlap
34.2% of CGGR's money is in holdings GK also owns. 67.3% of GK's money is in holdings CGGR also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
13 positions in common, counted across the 96 positions we hold weights for in CGGR and 27 in GK, against full books of 97 and 60.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 13 positions for GK that do not appear in our book for CGGR (31.3% of the fund), and 70 for CGGR that do not appear in GK (56.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CGGR | Weight in GK | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 3.88% | 10.42% | 6.54% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 5.07% | 8.14% | 3.07% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 3.24% | 8.15% | 4.91% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.66% | 5.24% | 0.58% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 2.10% | 7.28% | 5.18% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.43% | 4.35% | 0.08% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 2.53% | 5.48% | 2.95% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.38% | 3.65% | 1.27% |
| GEVGe Vernova, Inc. | 0.85% | 4.26% | 3.41% |
| NFLXNetflix, Inc. | 0.77% | 3.87% | 3.10% |
67.3% of GK is already inside CGGR.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGGR or GK?
CGGR has an expense ratio of 0.39% while GK charges 0.77%. CGGR is the cheaper option, by $38 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CGGR or GK?
Over the past year CGGR returned +8.20% vs +8.34% for GK, so GK leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CGGR or GK?
GK has been the more volatile fund at 22.7% annualized versus 19.3% for CGGR. Worst drawdown: CGGR -28.9% vs GK -37.3%.
Should I hold both CGGR and GK?
CGGR and GK have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CGGR and GK?
67.3% of GK's money is in holdings CGGR also owns. 67.3% of GK's is in holdings CGGR also owns. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 96 positions we hold weights for in CGGR and 27 in GK.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGGR or GK?
CGGR yields 0.15% while GK yields 0.07%, so CGGR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is GK better than CGGR?
CGGR has a lower expense ratio. CGGR led over 3Y and the full window, GK over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. CGGR is less concentrated, with 40.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.