CGGR vs GRNY
Capital Group Growth ETF vs Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF
Which is better, CGGR or GRNY?
GRNY has been ahead.
CGGR has a lower expense ratio. GRNY led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. GRNY is less concentrated, with 27.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGGR | GRNY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $26.6B | $4.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.15% | 0.13% |
| Holdings | 97 | 86 |
| YTD Return | +6.35% | +10.83%Best |
| 1Y Return | +8.20% | +10.25%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.14% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.1%Best | 17.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -23.4%Best | -24.2% |
| $10,000 over 1.9 years | $12,805 | $13,651Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.8% | 27.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Capital Group (US) | Fundstrat Capital |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Feb 22, 2022 | Nov 7, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 7, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.9 years).
CGGR vs GRNY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.
CGGR vs GRNY Performance
Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR) is an ETF from Capital Group (US) and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF (GRNY) is an ETF from Fundstrat Capital. Over the past year CGGR returned +8.20% while GRNY returned +10.25%. Year to date, CGGR is up 6.35% versus a gain of 10.83% for GRNY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GRNY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.3% compared with 17.1% for CGGR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.4% for CGGR and -24.2% for GRNY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGGR charges 0.39% per year while GRNY charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $75 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGGR currently yields 0.15% against 0.13% for GRNY.
Holdings Overlap
39.0% of CGGR's money is in holdings GRNY also owns. 56.3% of GRNY's money is in holdings CGGR also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
23 positions in common, counted across the 96 positions we hold weights for in CGGR and 42 in GRNY, against full books of 97 and 86.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 19 positions for GRNY that do not appear in our book for CGGR (43.1% of the fund), and 60 for CGGR that do not appear in GRNY (52.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CGGR | Weight in GRNY | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 5.07% | 2.47% | 2.60% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.66% | 2.50% | 2.16% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 4.17% | 2.37% | 1.80% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 3.88% | 2.62% | 1.26% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 3.10% | 2.30% | 0.80% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 2.53% | 2.43% | 0.10% |
| MSTRMicrostrategy Inc | 1.34% | 3.35% | 2.01% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.38% | 2.18% | 0.20% |
| INTCIntel Corporation | 1.43% | 3.05% | 1.62% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 2.10% | 2.20% | 0.10% |
56.3% of GRNY is already inside CGGR.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGGR or GRNY?
CGGR has an expense ratio of 0.39% while GRNY charges 0.75%. CGGR is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CGGR or GRNY?
Over the past year CGGR returned +8.20% vs +10.25% for GRNY, so GRNY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CGGR annualized +13.90% vs +17.80% for GRNY. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CGGR or GRNY?
GRNY has been the more volatile fund at 17.3% annualized versus 17.1% for CGGR. Worst drawdown: CGGR -23.4% vs GRNY -24.2%.
Should I hold both CGGR and GRNY?
CGGR and GRNY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CGGR and GRNY?
56.3% of GRNY's money is in holdings CGGR also owns. 56.3% of GRNY's is in holdings CGGR also owns. They hold 23 positions in common, counted across the 96 positions we hold weights for in CGGR and 42 in GRNY.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGGR or GRNY?
CGGR yields 0.15% while GRNY yields 0.13%, so CGGR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is GRNY better than CGGR?
CGGR has a lower expense ratio. GRNY led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. GRNY is less concentrated, with 27.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.