CGGR vs KOOL
Capital Group Growth ETF vs North Shore Equity Rotation ETF
Which is better, CGGR or KOOL?
Each has led over a different period.
CGGR has a lower expense ratio. CGGR led over the full window, KOOL over 1Y. CGGR is less concentrated, with 40.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGGR | KOOL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39%Best | 0.93% |
| AUM | $26.6B | $60M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.15% | 0.43% |
| Holdings | 97 | 42 |
| YTD Return | +6.35% | +15.54%Best |
| 1Y Return | +8.20% | +16.89%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.14% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.9% | 12.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -23.4% | -20.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.5 years | $14,918Best | $14,826 |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.8%Best | 42.8% |
| Fund Family | Capital Group (US) | North Shore Indices |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Feb 22, 2022 | Apr 1, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 2, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.5 years).
CGGR vs KOOL growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.5 years both funds cover.
CGGR vs KOOL Performance
Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR) is an ETF from Capital Group (US) and North Shore Equity Rotation ETF (KOOL) is an ETF from North Shore Indices. Over the past year CGGR returned +8.20% while KOOL returned +16.89%. Year to date, CGGR is up 6.35% versus a gain of 15.54% for KOOL.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CGGR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.9% compared with 12.0% for KOOL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.4% for CGGR and -20.6% for KOOL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGGR charges 0.39% per year while KOOL charges 0.93%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $93 annually, a gap of $54 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGGR currently yields 0.15% against 0.43% for KOOL.
Holdings Overlap
31.1% of CGGR's money is in holdings KOOL also owns. 36.9% of KOOL's money is in holdings CGGR also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
11 positions in common, counted across the 96 positions we hold weights for in CGGR and 44 in KOOL, against full books of 97 and 42.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 29 positions for KOOL that do not appear in our book for CGGR (56.1% of the fund), and 72 for CGGR that do not appear in KOOL (60.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CGGR | Weight in KOOL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 5.07% | 5.78% | 0.71% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 6.58% | 3.20% | 3.38% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.66% | 3.11% | 1.55% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 2.53% | 4.31% | 1.78% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 3.10% | 3.65% | 0.55% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.38% | 4.34% | 1.96% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.43% | 1.97% | 2.46% |
| PWRQuanta Services Inc | 0.82% | 4.75% | 3.93% |
| GEVGe Vernova, Inc. | 0.85% | 3.00% | 2.15% |
| ANETArista Networks Inc. | 0.51% | 1.51% | 1.00% |
36.9% of KOOL is already inside CGGR.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGGR or KOOL?
CGGR has an expense ratio of 0.39% while KOOL charges 0.93%. CGGR is the cheaper option, by $54 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CGGR or KOOL?
Over the past year CGGR returned +8.20% vs +16.89% for KOOL, so KOOL leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CGGR or KOOL?
CGGR has been the more volatile fund at 15.9% annualized versus 12.0% for KOOL. Worst drawdown: CGGR -23.4% vs KOOL -20.6%.
Should I hold both CGGR and KOOL?
CGGR and KOOL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CGGR and KOOL?
36.9% of KOOL's money is in holdings CGGR also owns. 36.9% of KOOL's is in holdings CGGR also owns. They hold 11 positions in common, counted across the 96 positions we hold weights for in CGGR and 44 in KOOL.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGGR or KOOL?
CGGR yields 0.15% while KOOL yields 0.43%, so KOOL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is KOOL better than CGGR?
CGGR has a lower expense ratio. CGGR led over the full window, KOOL over 1Y. CGGR is less concentrated, with 40.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.