CGGR vs THRO
Capital Group Growth ETF vs iShares US Thematic Rotation Active ETF
Which is better, CGGR or THRO?
Each has led over a different period.
CGGR has a lower expense ratio. CGGR led over 3Y, THRO over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. CGGR is less concentrated, with 40.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGGR | THRO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39%Best | 0.57% |
| AUM | $26.6B | $7.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.15% | 0.30% |
| Holdings | 97 | 251 |
| YTD Return | +6.35% | +14.55%Best |
| 1Y Return | +8.20% | +18.23%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.14%Best | +23.72% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.3% | 17.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -28.9% | -23.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.6 years | $19,434 | $19,871Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.8%Best | 43.5% |
| Fund Family | Capital Group (US) | BlackRock, Inc. (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Feb 22, 2022 | Dec 14, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 24, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.6 years).
CGGR vs THRO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.6 years both funds cover.
CGGR vs THRO Performance
Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR) is an ETF from Capital Group (US) and iShares US Thematic Rotation Active ETF (THRO) is an ETF from BlackRock, Inc. (US). Over the past year CGGR returned +8.20% while THRO returned +18.23%. Year to date, CGGR is up 6.35% versus a gain of 14.55% for THRO.
Over three years, CGGR compounded at +24.14% per year against +23.72% for THRO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CGGR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.3% compared with 17.3% for THRO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -28.9% for CGGR and -23.1% for THRO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGGR charges 0.39% per year while THRO charges 0.57%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $57 annually, a gap of $18 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGGR currently yields 0.15% against 0.30% for THRO.
Holdings Overlap
63.4% of CGGR's money is in holdings THRO also owns. 55.4% of THRO's money is in holdings CGGR also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
41 positions in common, counted across the 96 positions we hold weights for in CGGR and 247 in THRO, against full books of 97 and 251.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 126 positions for THRO that do not appear in our book for CGGR (43.5% of the fund), and 43 for CGGR that do not appear in THRO (27.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CGGR | Weight in THRO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 5.07% | 8.58% | 3.51% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.66% | 6.24% | 1.58% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 2.53% | 8.21% | 5.68% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 6.58% | 1.97% | 4.61% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 3.10% | 3.79% | 0.69% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.38% | 4.47% | 2.09% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.43% | 2.11% | 2.32% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 3.88% | 2.61% | 1.27% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 4.17% | 1.35% | 2.82% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 3.24% | 1.87% | 1.37% |
63.4% of CGGR is already inside THRO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGGR or THRO?
CGGR has an expense ratio of 0.39% while THRO charges 0.57%. CGGR is the cheaper option, by $18 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CGGR or THRO?
Over the past year CGGR returned +8.20% vs +18.23% for THRO, so THRO leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CGGR or THRO?
CGGR has been the more volatile fund at 19.3% annualized versus 17.3% for THRO. Worst drawdown: CGGR -28.9% vs THRO -23.1%.
Should I hold both CGGR and THRO?
CGGR and THRO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CGGR and THRO?
63.4% of CGGR's money is in holdings THRO also owns. 55.4% of THRO's is in holdings CGGR also owns. They hold 41 positions in common, counted across the 96 positions we hold weights for in CGGR and 247 in THRO.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGGR or THRO?
CGGR yields 0.15% while THRO yields 0.30%, so THRO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is THRO better than CGGR?
CGGR has a lower expense ratio. CGGR led over 3Y, THRO over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. CGGR is less concentrated, with 40.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.