CGGR vs XAIW
Capital Group Growth ETF vs SpaceXAI Lab Ecosystem ETF
Which is better, CGGR or XAIW?
CGGR costs less.
CGGR has a lower expense ratio. CGGR is less concentrated, with 40.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGGR | XAIW |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39%Best | 0.59% |
| AUM | $26.6B | $1M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.15% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 97 | 25 |
| YTD Return | +6.35%Best | -3.89% |
| 1Y Return | +8.20% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.14% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.8%Best | 61.4% |
| Fund Family | Capital Group (US) | Harbor Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Feb 22, 2022 | Aug 12, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
CGGR vs XAIW growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
CGGR vs XAIW Performance
Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR) is an ETF from Capital Group (US) and SpaceXAI Lab Ecosystem ETF (XAIW) is an ETF from Harbor Funds. Year to date, CGGR is up 6.35% versus a loss of 3.89% for XAIW.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGGR charges 0.39% per year while XAIW charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $59 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGGR currently yields 0.15% against 0.00% for XAIW.
Holdings Overlap
18.5% of CGGR's money is in holdings XAIW also owns. 44.0% of XAIW's money is in holdings CGGR also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
8 positions in common, counted across the 96 positions we hold weights for in CGGR and 26 in XAIW, against full books of 97 and 25.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 13 positions for XAIW that do not appear in our book for CGGR (40.9% of the fund), and 76 for CGGR that do not appear in XAIW (74.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CGGR | Weight in XAIW | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| SPCXSpace Exploration Technologies | 0.18% | 19.82% | 19.64% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 5.07% | 7.15% | 2.08% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 4.17% | 3.61% | 0.56% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.66% | 2.73% | 1.93% |
| 2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 1.57% | 4.46% | 2.89% |
| INTCIntel Corporation | 1.43% | 2.07% | 0.64% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 0.55% | 2.28% | 1.73% |
| GEVGe Vernova, Inc. | 0.85% | 1.90% | 1.05% |
44.0% of XAIW is already inside CGGR.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGGR or XAIW?
CGGR has an expense ratio of 0.39% while XAIW charges 0.59%. CGGR is the cheaper option, by $20 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between CGGR and XAIW?
44.0% of XAIW's money is in holdings CGGR also owns. 44.0% of XAIW's is in holdings CGGR also owns. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 96 positions we hold weights for in CGGR and 26 in XAIW.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGGR or XAIW?
CGGR yields 0.15% while XAIW yields 0.00%, so CGGR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XAIW better than CGGR?
CGGR has a lower expense ratio. CGGR is less concentrated, with 40.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.