CGPT vs QQQ
VegaShares AI Inference ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, CGPT or QQQ?
QQQ costs less.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 68.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGPT | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $1M | $506.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 20 | 321 |
| YTD Return | -13.84% | +19.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +22.47% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +26.18% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.42% |
| Top 10 Weight | 68.0% | 46.7%Best |
| Fund Family | VegaShares ETFs | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Aug 13, 2026 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
CGPT vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
CGPT vs QQQ Performance
VegaShares AI Inference ETF (CGPT) is an ETF from VegaShares ETFs and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, CGPT is down 13.84% versus a gain of 19.30% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGPT charges 0.75% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $18 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGPT currently yields 0.00% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
37.4% of CGPT's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 21.3% of QQQ's money is in holdings CGPT also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
6 positions in common, counted across the 20 positions we hold weights for in CGPT and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 20 and 321.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 87 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for CGPT (75.0% of the fund), and 4 for CGPT that do not appear in QQQ (23.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
37.4% of CGPT is already inside QQQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGPT or QQQ?
CGPT has an expense ratio of 0.75% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between CGPT and QQQ?
37.4% of CGPT's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 21.3% of QQQ's is in holdings CGPT also owns. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 20 positions we hold weights for in CGPT and 101 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGPT or QQQ?
CGPT yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than CGPT?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 68.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.