CGRO vs LRGC
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF vs AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF
Which is better, CGRO or LRGC?
LRGC has been ahead.
LRGC has a lower expense ratio. LRGC led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. LRGC is less concentrated, with 44.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGRO | LRGC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.89% | 0.39%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $1.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 30.13% | 0.53% |
| Holdings | 33 | 72 |
| YTD Return | -27.25% | +10.99%Best |
| 1Y Return | -29.64% | +13.29%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +1.19% | +20.81%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.19% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.1% | 12.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -36.5% | -19.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.1 years | $10,374 | $17,762Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 63.6% | 44.8%Best |
| Fund Family | CORE VALUES ALPHA | AllianceBernstein L.P. |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Oct 16, 2023 | Sep 20, 2023 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 17, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.1 years).
CGRO vs LRGC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.1 years both funds cover.
CGRO vs LRGC Performance
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF (CGRO) is an ETF from CORE VALUES ALPHA and AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC) is an ETF from AllianceBernstein L.P.. Over the past year CGRO returned -29.64% while LRGC returned +13.29%. Year to date, CGRO is down 27.25% versus a gain of 10.99% for LRGC.
Over three years, CGRO compounded at +1.19% per year against +20.81% for LRGC.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CGRO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.1% compared with 12.5% for LRGC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.5% for CGRO and -19.4% for LRGC. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.05. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGRO charges 0.89% per year while LRGC charges 0.39%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $39 annually, a gap of $50 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGRO currently yields 30.13% against 0.53% for LRGC.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 29 holdings in CGRO and 69 in LRGC, totalling 98.5% and 99.2% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in CGRO and 69 in LRGC, against full books of 33 and 72.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 65 positions for LRGC that do not appear in our book for CGRO (96.0% of the fund), and 2 for CGRO that do not appear in LRGC (12.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CGRO and LRGC you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGRO or LRGC?
CGRO has an expense ratio of 0.89% while LRGC charges 0.39%. LRGC is the cheaper option, by $50 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CGRO or LRGC?
Over the past year CGRO returned -29.64% vs +13.29% for LRGC, so LRGC leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CGRO or LRGC?
CGRO has been the more volatile fund at 24.1% annualized versus 12.5% for LRGC. Worst drawdown: CGRO -36.5% vs LRGC -19.4%.
Should I hold both CGRO and LRGC?
CGRO and LRGC have a monthly-return correlation of -0.05, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGRO or LRGC?
CGRO yields 30.13% while LRGC yields 0.53%, so CGRO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is LRGC better than CGRO?
LRGC has a lower expense ratio. LRGC led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. LRGC is less concentrated, with 44.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.