CGUS vs FDAT

CGUS vs FDAT

Which is better, CGUS or FDAT?

CGUS has been ahead.

CGUS has a lower expense ratio. CGUS led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: CGUSHigher Returns: CGUS

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCGUSFDAT
Expense Ratio0.33%Best1.16%
AUM$12.3B$36M
Dividend Yield0.83%5.94%
Holdings759
YTD Return+11.95%Best+2.79%
1Y Return+15.39%Best+2.00%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.76%Best+9.28%
Volatility (annualized)12.1%8.6%Best
Max Drawdown-18.1%-8.2%Best
$10,000 over 3.5 years$19,431Best$13,015
Top 10 Weight43.8%-
Fund FamilyCapital Group (US)Tactical Advantage
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionFeb 22, 2022Apr 11, 2023

Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 20, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.5 years).

CGUS vs FDAT growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.5 years both funds cover.

Compare CGUS against instead:CGUS vs SPYCGUS vs QQQCGUS vs VOOCGUS vs VTIFDAT against:FDAT vs VXUS

CGUS vs FDAT Performance

Capital Group Core Equity ETF (CGUS) is an ETF from Capital Group (US) and Tactical Advantage ETF (FDAT) is an ETF from Tactical Advantage. Over the past year CGUS returned +15.39% while FDAT returned +2.00%. Year to date, CGUS is up 11.95% versus a gain of 2.79% for FDAT.

Over three years, CGUS compounded at +21.76% per year against +9.28% for FDAT. Across the full 4-year window we track, CGUS has the edge at +20.90% annualized vs +7.82%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

CGUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.1% compared with 8.6% for FDAT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.1% for CGUS and -8.2% for FDAT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

CGUS charges 0.33% per year while FDAT charges 1.16%. On a $10,000 position that is $33 vs $116 annually, a gap of $83 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGUS currently yields 0.83% against 5.94% for FDAT.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 68 holdings in CGUS and 8 in FDAT, totalling 100.0% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 68 positions we hold weights for in CGUS and 8 in FDAT, against full books of 75 and 9.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 8 positions for FDAT that do not appear in our book for CGUS (100.0% of the fund), and 59 for CGUS that do not appear in FDAT (89.4%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of CGUS and FDAT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

CGUSFDAT

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, CGUS or FDAT?

CGUS has an expense ratio of 0.33% while FDAT charges 1.16%. CGUS is the cheaper option, by $83 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, CGUS or FDAT?

Over the past year CGUS returned +15.39% vs +2.00% for FDAT, so CGUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), CGUS annualized +20.90% vs +7.82% for FDAT. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, CGUS or FDAT?

CGUS has been the more volatile fund at 12.1% annualized versus 8.6% for FDAT. Worst drawdown: CGUS -18.1% vs FDAT -8.2%.

Should I hold both CGUS and FDAT?

CGUS and FDAT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, CGUS or FDAT?

CGUS yields 0.83% while FDAT yields 5.94%, so FDAT currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is FDAT better than CGUS?

CGUS has a lower expense ratio. CGUS led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.