CGUS vs GDV
Capital Group Core Equity ETF vs Gabelli Dividend & Income Trust
Which is better, CGUS or GDV?
CGUS has been ahead.
CGUS has a lower expense ratio. CGUS led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGUS | GDV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.33%Best | 1.30% |
| AUM | $12.3B | $3.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.83% | 5.50% |
| Holdings | 75 | 715 |
| YTD Return | +11.95%Best | +6.53% |
| 1Y Return | +15.39%Best | +11.90% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.76%Best | +20.57% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +7.80% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.7%Best | 17.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -21.9%Best | -22.6% |
| $10,000 over 4.6 years | $19,073Best | $16,008 |
| Fund Family | Capital Group (US) | Gabelli Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 22, 2022 | Nov 28, 2003 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 24, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.6 years).
CGUS vs GDV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.6 years both funds cover.
CGUS vs GDV Performance
Capital Group Core Equity ETF (CGUS) is an ETF from Capital Group (US) and Gabelli Dividend & Income Trust (GDV) is an ETF from Gabelli Funds. Over the past year CGUS returned +15.39% while GDV returned +11.90%. Year to date, CGUS is up 11.95% versus a gain of 6.53% for GDV.
Over three years, CGUS compounded at +21.76% per year against +20.57% for GDV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GDV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.2% compared with 14.7% for CGUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.9% for CGUS and -22.6% for GDV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGUS charges 0.33% per year while GDV charges 1.30%. On a $10,000 position that is $33 vs $130 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGUS currently yields 0.83% against 5.50% for GDV.
Holdings Overlap
At least 79.6% of CGUS's money is in holdings GDV also owns.
Only one direction is shown: for GDV, our book for it lists positions totalling 110.0% of the fund, which is what a leveraged book looks like and is not a denominator we can divide by.
Most of CGUS is already inside GDV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 186 days apart, CGUS as of Oct 3, 2026 and GDV as of Mar 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
43 positions in common, counted across the 68 positions we hold weights for in CGUS and 678 in GDV, against full books of 75 and 715.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CGUS | Weight in GDV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.90% | 1.32% | 6.58% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 7.05% | 1.41% | 5.64% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 5.26% | 0.59% | 4.67% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.75% | 0.87% | 3.88% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 4.55% | 0.71% | 3.84% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 3.68% | 1.53% | 2.15% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 1.74% | 2.42% | 0.68% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 1.62% | 2.40% | 0.78% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 1.89% | 1.67% | 0.22% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 2.53% | 0.97% | 1.56% |
79.6% of CGUS is already inside GDV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGUS or GDV?
CGUS has an expense ratio of 0.33% while GDV charges 1.30%. CGUS is the cheaper option, by $97 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CGUS or GDV?
Over the past year CGUS returned +15.39% vs +11.90% for GDV, so CGUS leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CGUS or GDV?
GDV has been the more volatile fund at 17.2% annualized versus 14.7% for CGUS. Worst drawdown: CGUS -21.9% vs GDV -22.6%.
Should I hold both CGUS and GDV?
CGUS and GDV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CGUS and GDV?
At least 79.6% of CGUS's money is in holdings GDV also owns. Our book for GDV is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 43 positions in common, counted across the 68 positions we hold weights for in CGUS and 678 in GDV.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGUS or GDV?
CGUS yields 0.83% while GDV yields 5.50%, so GDV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is GDV better than CGUS?
CGUS has a lower expense ratio. CGUS led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.