CGUS vs TIME
Capital Group Core Equity ETF vs Clockwise US Core Equity ETF
Which is better, CGUS or TIME?
CGUS has been ahead.
CGUS has a lower expense ratio. CGUS led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. CGUS is less concentrated, with 43.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGUS | TIME |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.33%Best | 0.96% |
| AUM | $12.3B | $16M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.83% | 0.67% |
| Holdings | 75 | 56 |
| YTD Return | +11.95%Best | +11.28% |
| 1Y Return | +15.39%Best | +13.37% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.76%Best | +18.43% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.7%Best | 24.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -21.9%Best | -41.3% |
| $10,000 over 4.6 years | $19,073Best | $15,003 |
| Top 10 Weight | 43.8%Best | 46.2% |
| Fund Family | Capital Group (US) | Clockwise Capital |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 22, 2022 | Jan 27, 2022 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 24, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.6 years).
CGUS vs TIME growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.6 years both funds cover.
CGUS vs TIME Performance
Capital Group Core Equity ETF (CGUS) is an ETF from Capital Group (US) and Clockwise US Core Equity ETF (TIME) is an ETF from Clockwise Capital. Over the past year CGUS returned +15.39% while TIME returned +13.37%. Year to date, CGUS is up 11.95% versus a gain of 11.28% for TIME.
Over three years, CGUS compounded at +21.76% per year against +18.43% for TIME.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TIME has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.3% compared with 14.7% for CGUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.9% for CGUS and -41.3% for TIME. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGUS charges 0.33% per year while TIME charges 0.96%. On a $10,000 position that is $33 vs $96 annually, a gap of $63 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGUS currently yields 0.83% against 0.67% for TIME.
Holdings Overlap
48.7% of CGUS's money is in holdings TIME also owns. 52.3% of TIME's money is in holdings CGUS also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
18 positions in common, counted across the 68 positions we hold weights for in CGUS and 59 in TIME, against full books of 75 and 56.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 40 positions for TIME that do not appear in our book for CGUS (45.8% of the fund), and 41 for CGUS that do not appear in TIME (40.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CGUS | Weight in TIME | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.90% | 9.34% | 1.44% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 7.05% | 6.28% | 0.77% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 2.53% | 9.28% | 6.75% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.75% | 3.68% | 1.07% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 3.14% | 4.78% | 1.64% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 5.26% | 2.55% | 2.71% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 4.55% | 1.22% | 3.33% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 3.68% | 1.81% | 1.87% |
| PMPhilip Morris International Inc. | 0.92% | 2.49% | 1.57% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 2.08% | 1.00% | 1.08% |
52.3% of TIME is already inside CGUS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGUS or TIME?
CGUS has an expense ratio of 0.33% while TIME charges 0.96%. CGUS is the cheaper option, by $63 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CGUS or TIME?
Over the past year CGUS returned +15.39% vs +13.37% for TIME, so CGUS leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CGUS or TIME?
TIME has been the more volatile fund at 24.3% annualized versus 14.7% for CGUS. Worst drawdown: CGUS -21.9% vs TIME -41.3%.
Should I hold both CGUS and TIME?
CGUS and TIME have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CGUS and TIME?
52.3% of TIME's money is in holdings CGUS also owns. 52.3% of TIME's is in holdings CGUS also owns. They hold 18 positions in common, counted across the 68 positions we hold weights for in CGUS and 59 in TIME.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGUS or TIME?
CGUS yields 0.83% while TIME yields 0.67%, so CGUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TIME better than CGUS?
CGUS has a lower expense ratio. CGUS led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. CGUS is less concentrated, with 43.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.